2026-01-11 21:29:56

If the fundamentals align and execution stays on track, we could be looking at a 300M market cap scenario for this one. Given where similar projects have landed and the current market conditions, it's actually a realistic target to chase.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MechanicalMartel

· 01-12 20:08

300M? Ha, that's assuming the execution doesn't mess up.

View OriginalReply0

TokenSherpa

· 01-12 10:30

look, let me break this down for you—300M is achievable if governance participation stays above historical averages and tokenomics actually reflect voting power dynamics properly. if you examine the data from comparable projects, the precedent is there, tbh.

Reply0

SquidTeacher

· 01-11 22:00

300M market cap? Dream on, execution is the key.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller69

· 01-11 22:00

300M is really a bit optimistic, which ones does it basically compare to? Execution is the real weakness.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSweaterFan

· 01-11 21:56

300M? Sis, are you joking, or do you really believe in this project?

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-11 21:33

300M? Sounds good, but the key is whether the execution can really keep up. These days, everyone talks a good game.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 01-11 21:33

300M sounds like a number, but the real test is whether the mechanism design can support this valuation. Throughout history, many projects have boasted wildly, only to collapse once governance took over.

View OriginalReply0

0xSoulless

· 01-11 21:31

300M? Ha, it's the same old story. Let's talk after the big funds finish harvesting the retail investors.

View OriginalReply0