2026-01-11 14:30:30

Web3's core gameplay is ultimately about compositional innovation, not reinventing the wheel.

Modular thinking is especially popular in the cross-chain ecosystem. Breaking it down, a good cross-chain solution should decompose complex processes into several independent Lego blocks—route discovery helps you find the optimal transaction path, liquidity aggregation pulls the best prices from multiple sources, and secure settlement is the reassurance of the entire system, ensuring each step is trustworthy.

The beauty of this approach is that developers don't have to start from scratch; they can flexibly assemble components according to their needs. Whatever kind of cross-chain experience they want, they can build the corresponding product. For users, what ultimately appears is a unified, smooth interface—everything seamlessly connected, but behind the scenes, multiple protocols are coordinating. This design philosophy not only lowers the development barrier but also provides users with a better experience.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropAutomaton

· 19h ago

Modularization is indeed great, but there are few projects that can truly do it well.

View OriginalReply0

LightningPacketLoss

· 01-11 17:52

Modularity is truly a solution, but how many projects in reality have actually achieved it? Most are still just piling things up.

View OriginalReply0

NotSatoshi

· 01-11 14:59

Basically, it's like LEGO building blocks; it should have been played this way all along.

View OriginalReply0

unrekt.eth

· 01-11 14:59

The modular approach is indeed great, but the key still depends on having a good protocol to support it.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeOnChain

· 01-11 14:56

The LEGO bricks analogy is brilliant, but I just don't know how many projects can really do this well now.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 01-11 14:48

There's nothing wrong with that; modularization is indeed the right path. However, most projects are still just stacking components, and very few truly achieve LEGO-style assembly.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinArbitrageur

· 01-11 14:40

actually nailed it on the liquidity aggregation piece... but skipped over basis point deterioration across multiple hops. bag holders won't notice until slippage eats their lunch

Reply0

MEVVictimAlliance

· 01-11 14:39

Well said, that's exactly what I've been wanting to say. The LEGO brick analogy is brilliant; there's really no need to rebuild the underlying infrastructure for every project. Modularity, in my opinion, is about reducing trial-and-error costs and enabling more people to participate in innovation. But to be honest, only a few are truly capable of doing this well... As for cross-chain solutions, I really haven't seen any approach that can fully solve the problem of liquidity fragmentation; everyone is still operating independently.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-11 14:35

That's right, the modular approach is indeed the trend. However, truly seamless projects are still few, and most cross-chain solutions still feel fragmented. The Lego brick theory sounds great, but protocol coordination can easily become a new bottleneck.

View OriginalReply0