2026-01-11 14:30:09

I don't quite understand the decision-making logic of certain chains—why choose problematic individuals to join the core team? Such appointments directly affect the trust and security of the ecosystem. These personnel decisions often reveal governance flaws in the project, especially when there are hidden scam risks behind them, which can deal a bigger blow to the entire ecosystem. What exactly is the project team thinking?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropF5Bro

· 3h ago

I don't understand. Why are they still involving problematic personnel... I'm really speechless.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 01-12 15:07

Really, this kind of personnel appointment is outrageous, and the ecosystem trust has collapsed directly. --- It's 2024 and they're still stuffing problematic figures into the core team. Isn't this suicidal? --- Emm... the project team probably did it on purpose, right? Otherwise, how could it be so absurd? --- I just want to know how these decisions passed approval. They really don't care about users at all. --- Governance loopholes + personnel chaos = a sign of an impending rug pull. I've learned that. --- ? If there's a problem with the core team, the entire ecosystem will have to pay the price. So frustrating. --- There’s probably some利益输送 behind this, otherwise it doesn’t make sense. --- Every time I see this kind of operation, I suspect it’s a timed bomb. --- Basically, the project team lacks real risk control awareness. Sad. --- Recalling the last personnel appointment in a certain project, it’s the same mess.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityJanitor

· 01-11 14:59

It's all about the利益链, if you can't produce anything, you rely on connections to survive.

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 01-11 14:57

I should have known earlier, the personnel appointments in this circle have never been reliable, probably all driven by vested interests.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 01-11 14:57

Really, one lousy personnel appointment can ruin a project. I've seen it too many times.

View OriginalReply0

ShadowStaker

· 01-11 14:52

yeah, the governance red flags here are kind of... predictable honestly. bad actors always find their way into core teams when proper vetting just doesn't exist. decentralization metrics mean nothing if you're handing keys to sketchy people lol

Reply0

GateUser-26d7f434

· 01-11 14:52

Really, this kind of personnel appointment is outrageous. When a bad person gets in, the entire ecosystem suffers. Does the project team really have no oversight? Or do they simply not care? These days, even choosing a core member can go wrong. I just don't understand. I think this is why some blockchains are gradually losing people's trust—the team is completely rotten. No wonder some people run away; who can stand working with a project team like this?

View OriginalReply0