Recently, an interesting phenomenon has caught attention—after a certain privacy storage network experienced over 30% price volatility in a single day, the on-chain activity did not decline accordingly.

Specifically, the daily number of privacy transactions and storage contract calls remain high, with no obvious sharp drop. What is the underlying reason? The community has a hypothesis: the network may have an embedded "dynamic fee anchoring" mechanism.

Simply put, this mechanism aims to keep the actual fiat currency cost paid by users relatively stable—even if the token price fluctuates, the user's actual burden doesn't become too severe. As a result, a price drop won't directly scare away users, and their willingness to use the network remains intact.

More importantly, on the node side. The staking node's fee revenue adopts a floating system. When network activity is high, this revenue can provide quite good returns for node operators. During price declines, this compensation becomes especially important—it maintains the enthusiasm of nodes to continue providing services, thus ensuring the stable operation of the entire network.

This market fluctuation is essentially a stress test. The results show that through this economic model design, the network successfully creates a "firewall" between price volatility and ecological activity—allowing them to operate relatively independently, which is uncommon in previous projects.