Content grading systems exist on many platforms, and this logic is actually quite interesting. Simply put — it divides user traffic into several tiers, with each tier's traffic scale increasing sequentially.
Newly published content starts gaining exposure from the lowest traffic pool. Once the content performs well, receives enough interactions and attention, it can trigger a promotion mechanism to move into a higher traffic pool, gaining the maximum traffic support for that tier.
The brilliance of this system lies in — providing all content creators with an equal initial opportunity, while also enabling prioritized dissemination of high-quality content through a performance-driven upgrade mechanism. For the Web3 community, this tiered incentive approach is also worth learning from, as it can effectively enhance community content activity and quality.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 18h ago
Damn, isn't this logic just the same as traditional internet? Can Web3 come up with some new tricks?
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdropper
· 01-11 14:02
Well said, this is the cruel beauty of algorithms; traffic doesn't come for free.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPhantom
· 01-11 14:00
To be honest, this tiered system still sounds a bit centralized.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 01-11 13:55
To be honest, this tiered system sounds very fair, but how much content can truly break through? Most will probably remain at the bottom, gathering dust.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiac
· 01-11 13:48
Superficial equality but underlying data dictatorship. The promised mechanism design is actually just a black box of traffic, and the algorithm choking method has long been played out.
View OriginalReply0
GraphGuru
· 01-11 13:44
This tiered system is actually a breeding ground for involution; no matter how high-quality the underlying content is, it will be submerged for a while.
View OriginalReply0
MemecoinTrader
· 01-11 13:43
yo this tiering system is basically just gamified attention arbitrage wrapped in "fairness" rhetoric. the real play? most creators don't understand the feedback loops so they never optimize for that initial micro-pool. that's where alphas get printed ngl
Reply0
RuntimeError
· 01-11 13:33
Haha, this tiered system is actually just the art of involution; no matter how much the underlying content is overworked or exhausted, it can't improve.
Content grading systems exist on many platforms, and this logic is actually quite interesting. Simply put — it divides user traffic into several tiers, with each tier's traffic scale increasing sequentially.
Newly published content starts gaining exposure from the lowest traffic pool. Once the content performs well, receives enough interactions and attention, it can trigger a promotion mechanism to move into a higher traffic pool, gaining the maximum traffic support for that tier.
The brilliance of this system lies in — providing all content creators with an equal initial opportunity, while also enabling prioritized dissemination of high-quality content through a performance-driven upgrade mechanism. For the Web3 community, this tiered incentive approach is also worth learning from, as it can effectively enhance community content activity and quality.