2026-01-11 13:26:33

This week, I tried out the new features of the exchange, and it was really interesting. Their newly launched "Conditional Stop-Loss Clusters" feature caught my eye — it allows setting interrelated stop-loss points between perpetual contracts and spot. Once the price triggers any of these conditions, the engine will automatically execute the corresponding operation.

What impressed me the most are three points: First, there are no gas fees, which directly reduces trading costs. Second, the execution speed is very fast, with good latency control, so there's no need to worry about slippage. Third, the risk management logic is clear, and multi-leg positions can be protected synchronously without manual monitoring.

For traders who frequently switch between spot and contracts, this design indeed solves many pain points. Automated execution allows you to focus more on the strategy itself rather than constantly watching the screen. Overall, it's worth a try.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

YieldWhisperer

· 4h ago

It sounds pretty good, but is there really no slippage at all? I'm a bit skeptical. --- Did the gas fee directly save? That's the most satisfying part; finally an exchange has thought of this pain point. --- Automatic stop-loss clustering sounds high-end, but is it stable in actual use? Has anyone experienced a failure? --- The multi-long single-leg protection really solves the problem, much better than manually flipping screens. --- Good delay control is the key point; a millisecond difference in slippage can make a big difference. --- Not having to watch the market is really convenient, but I still don't quite trust the machine's judgment. --- Linked stop-loss for futures and spot trading—this idea should have been around a long time ago. --- Lowering costs is a solid benefit, but does the execution logic get too complicated? Beginners might easily fall into traps. --- Worth trying, start with a small amount to test if it's reliable. --- Feels like the exchange is competing again, but this time the feature actually solves a real problem.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingToReadDocs

· 14h ago

Wow, this feature is really awesome. I never have to wake up in the middle of the night to close positions again.

View OriginalReply0

TokenDustCollector

· 01-13 05:18

No, this stop-loss cluster is really effective. I finally don't have to monitor the market 24/7.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-11 13:56

Wow, really? Finally, an exchange has solved this pain point, no more manual monitoring needed.

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-11 13:56

According to the incentive mechanism design in the white paper, this conditional stop-loss cluster essentially implements the logic of atomic swaps off-chain—it's worth noting that the absence of gas fees implicitly carries centralized risks. You should carefully review their governance proposal to see what it says.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-11 13:40

Wow, I finally don't have to wake up in the middle of the night to check the market. This feature is really awesome. No, it even saves on gas fees? How much money does that save? Protecting both contracts and spot trading at the same time, so cool. Is this thing reliable? Will it get stuck or miss orders? But with such low latency, it does sound really comfortable. Auto stop-loss cluster? Basically, it's a blessing for lazy people. No more manual operations one by one. I'm a bit tempted, but I want to observe a bit more and hear how others have experienced it.

View OriginalReply0

ChainMaskedRider

· 01-11 13:29

Wow, this stop-loss clustering is really amazing. I finally don't have to be woken up in the middle of the night by slippage anymore.

View OriginalReply0