To say that this round of AI marketing hype has been a mixed bag of joy and worry. BlueFocus, Leo Holdings, Shengguang Group, and Yidian Tianxia each occupy different peaks, all seemingly running on this track, but their approaches are completely different.
First, let's look at BlueFocus, the veteran. About 80% of their revenue relies on overseas platforms like Google, Meta, and TikTok, especially major clients in gaming, e-commerce, and internet sectors. Their AI strategy is centered around the BlueAI matrix, covering everything from content generation to delivery optimization. Data shows that by the third quarter of 2025, AI-related revenue has reached nearly 2.5 billion yuan, with half of their business already AI-driven. However, there are obvious issues—accounts receivable turnover pressure is significant, and their asset-liability ratio still appears a bit inflated.
Leo Holdings is taking a different route. They operate in both machinery manufacturing and digital marketing, mainly cutting low-margin channel agencies in marketing and shifting focus to high-value-added strategic creativity. They have developed their own AI tools, LEO AI 1.0 and large models, and are also collaborating deeply with Alibaba's Tongyi Qianwen. This approach is more restrained, focusing on core competitiveness.
Everyone is competing, but their strategies are truly different.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTragedy
· 6h ago
BlueFocus's 2.5 billion AI revenue sounds impressive, but the accounts receivable are indeed a hidden risk. The risk of opening champagne before the money is received is too high.
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 23h ago
BlueFocus's revenue share looks a bit risky, relying on just Google... Leo is actually stable here, not greedy.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-afe07a92
· 01-11 16:57
BlueFocus's accounts receivable issue really can't be sustained. 2.5 billion in revenue looks good, but cash flow is the real king.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-11 13:53
BlueFocus's 2.5 billion is probably just hype. With such tight accounts receivable, how can they dare to boast about AI-driven? Leo Holdings, on the other hand, is straightforward; sticking with Alibaba for mutual support is the right approach.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 01-11 13:51
BlueFocus's 2.5 billion AI revenue looks impressive, but can the accounts receivable pressure really hold up? It depends on the subsequent realization of revenue.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemur
· 01-11 13:47
BlueFocus's recent 2.5 billion AI revenue is indeed impressive, but we should be cautious about the significant accounts receivable turnover pressure.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLicker
· 01-11 13:43
The accounts receivable turnover pressure of BlueFocus sounds like it’s just fronting money for the big boss. No matter how powerful BlueAI is, it has to stay alive first.
To say that this round of AI marketing hype has been a mixed bag of joy and worry. BlueFocus, Leo Holdings, Shengguang Group, and Yidian Tianxia each occupy different peaks, all seemingly running on this track, but their approaches are completely different.
First, let's look at BlueFocus, the veteran. About 80% of their revenue relies on overseas platforms like Google, Meta, and TikTok, especially major clients in gaming, e-commerce, and internet sectors. Their AI strategy is centered around the BlueAI matrix, covering everything from content generation to delivery optimization. Data shows that by the third quarter of 2025, AI-related revenue has reached nearly 2.5 billion yuan, with half of their business already AI-driven. However, there are obvious issues—accounts receivable turnover pressure is significant, and their asset-liability ratio still appears a bit inflated.
Leo Holdings is taking a different route. They operate in both machinery manufacturing and digital marketing, mainly cutting low-margin channel agencies in marketing and shifting focus to high-value-added strategic creativity. They have developed their own AI tools, LEO AI 1.0 and large models, and are also collaborating deeply with Alibaba's Tongyi Qianwen. This approach is more restrained, focusing on core competitiveness.
Everyone is competing, but their strategies are truly different.