2026-01-11 12:26:04

User behavior shift beats pure tech innovation—this is the real moat. Cricket fandom offers a perfect playbook here. Rather than forcing fans into Web3 first, then explaining blockchain concepts, the smarter approach mirrors what they already do: support teams, collect moments, compete with peers. The blockchain mechanics happen in the background.

Fans don't think "I want to participate onchain." They think "I want exclusive access to my favorite player's content" or "I want to prove my loyalty with verified collectibles." Meet them there.

The tech stacks up fine. What moves the needle is when crypto becomes the infrastructure, not the story. Familiar interactions—voting for player lineups, trading limited-edition memorabilia, unlocking tier rewards—feel natural because they're rooted in existing fan culture.

This matters because Web3 adoption historically got it backwards: launch the tech, then hunt for behavior. The winners will ship the opposite. Start with the community ritual, bolt on onchain rails invisibly, and watch engagement explode.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerRugResistant

· 13h ago

That's a great point. This is the part that Web3 has never really understood. Don't tell me about chains or smart contracts first; let me enjoy it first.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketNoodler

· 01-11 15:04

That's right, which is why most Web3 projects die so quickly. They spend all day hyping up technology until they're exhausted, but users don't care about your chain or coin stuff. The demand hasn't changed; people just want to watch sports, want exclusive content, and want to show loyalty—these desires are never outdated. As long as blockchain is quietly laid underneath as infrastructure, the user experience becomes even smoother. The projects from a few years ago all died because they fell for the "educate the market first" trap, hilarious. Reverse thinking is the way to survive. Behavior-driven, technology stealth—simply put, that's what it's all about.

View OriginalReply0

DaoTherapy

· 01-11 12:56

That's right, those people used to do the opposite... first throwing out a bunch of blockchain terminology, and users had already left. I agree with the logic in this article; starting from user habits is the right approach.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHobo

· 01-11 12:55

Well said, this is the right way to approach Web3. Don't always think about teaching people what blockchain is; just wrap it around what they like. The cricket example is brilliant.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSeller

· 01-11 12:38

To be honest, this logic makes sense. Those people used to love to oppose, always thinking about how to teach others what blockchain is, but in the end, users had already left. It still has to start from human desires. Fans want that exclusive content and a sense of vanity. If you hide the chain well, allowing voting and trading as needed, they simply won't feel the existence of technology—that's the real winner.

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 01-11 12:35

ngl this is just UX wrapping with extra steps. the infrastructure still collapses if you don't have product-market fit underneath, which cricket fandom *might* have but most web3 projects absolutely don't.

Reply0

SerLiquidated

· 01-11 12:35

To be honest, this is the right path for Web3. Don't come out throwing around words like blockchain, gas fee, and smart contracts. Fans just want to watch games, collect cards, and show off to friends. Infrastructure should stay in the background. The cricket example is perfect.

View OriginalReply0