In the highly competitive Layer 1 space, Dusk Network has taken a different path. Instead of pursuing "broad and comprehensive" solutions, it focuses on "niche segments," positioning itself as a "compliant privacy financial chain." The viability of this approach depends heavily on whether the technology can truly meet the complex demands of the financial industry.
So how has Dusk's technology evolved? The core idea boils down to two words: modularity.
**Consensus is particularly interesting.** Early on, they used a Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) variant, ensuring the finality of financial transactions, but at the cost of higher node requirements. Recent technical plans reveal that the team is researching "hybrid consensus" — it sounds complex, but the logic is straightforward: the financial settlement layer maintains a high-security BFT consensus without wavering, while the data availability layer or application sidechains adopt a lighter consensus model. The obvious benefit of this approach is that, without compromising core security, network scalability can increase rapidly, and participation can also be boosted.
**Upgrading the privacy layer is even more critical.** This isn't just about iterating encryption algorithms; it’s about adapting to compliance frameworks — which is highly attractive to traditional finance.
Even more ambitious is their "Horizon Cross-Chain Privacy Bridge." This is not just a technical product but a strategic shift — transforming from a specialized chain within the Sui ecosystem into a multi-chain privacy financial hub. If this step succeeds, Dusk’s potential will be significantly expanded.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShitcoinArbitrageur
· 01-11 12:54
Mixed consensus is really an interesting concept, but is it possible to successfully navigate the path of compliance and privacy?
View OriginalReply0
MrDecoder
· 01-11 12:53
Dividing the track is indeed a clever move, but can compliance and privacy really come together in practice? It feels much easier on paper than in reality.
View OriginalReply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
· 01-11 12:46
The path of subdivided tracks depends on subsequent implementation, but the hybrid consensus mechanism is indeed quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 01-11 12:41
I understand the concept of hybrid consensus; I just want to find a balance between security and scalability. It looks promising.
If Horizon's project is executed well, it can indeed change the game. The concept of multi-chain privacy finance being proactively deployed is worth paying attention to.
But honestly, the path of compliant privacy sounds beautiful, yet the real challenge is implementation. It depends on whether it can truly attract big players from traditional finance.
I think the modular approach is viable, but I'm worried it might end up as a niche chain. It needs ecosystem support to succeed.
Hybrid consensus sounds complicated, but I get the logic. The key is to see how well it performs in practice.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleMaid
· 01-11 12:39
Mixed consensus is indeed interesting; focusing on niche segments is much more reliable than trying to do everything.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrant
· 01-11 12:35
The path of compliant privacy finance is indeed differentiated, but whether hybrid consensus can truly run smoothly depends on how it performs after implementation.
In the highly competitive Layer 1 space, Dusk Network has taken a different path. Instead of pursuing "broad and comprehensive" solutions, it focuses on "niche segments," positioning itself as a "compliant privacy financial chain." The viability of this approach depends heavily on whether the technology can truly meet the complex demands of the financial industry.
So how has Dusk's technology evolved? The core idea boils down to two words: modularity.
**Consensus is particularly interesting.** Early on, they used a Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) variant, ensuring the finality of financial transactions, but at the cost of higher node requirements. Recent technical plans reveal that the team is researching "hybrid consensus" — it sounds complex, but the logic is straightforward: the financial settlement layer maintains a high-security BFT consensus without wavering, while the data availability layer or application sidechains adopt a lighter consensus model. The obvious benefit of this approach is that, without compromising core security, network scalability can increase rapidly, and participation can also be boosted.
**Upgrading the privacy layer is even more critical.** This isn't just about iterating encryption algorithms; it’s about adapting to compliance frameworks — which is highly attractive to traditional finance.
Even more ambitious is their "Horizon Cross-Chain Privacy Bridge." This is not just a technical product but a strategic shift — transforming from a specialized chain within the Sui ecosystem into a multi-chain privacy financial hub. If this step succeeds, Dusk’s potential will be significantly expanded.