In the early stages of Web3 development, everyone focused more on speed and storytelling. But as the ecosystem gradually improves, a bunch of problems have started to surface. What's the biggest issue? Simply put, it's about where to store the data.
Think about it—if core data still relies on centralized services, then no matter how impressive the application layer is or how many creative ideas there are, the entire system still carries risks. It's like building a house on quicksand; if the foundation isn't stable, everything is pointless.
So I've recently started researching decentralized storage protocols. The idea behind these projects is straightforward—not aiming for overnight riches, but wanting to provide a reliable data infrastructure for Web3. How do they do it? By dispersing data across multiple nodes and adding verification mechanisms to ensure data integrity. This way, they avoid single points of failure and align with the long-term goal of decentralization.
For developers, a stable underlying layer means they can confidently build applications without constantly worrying about storage issues. For users, data becomes safer, and they won't lose their data if the platform suddenly goes offline. This value might not be immediately reflected in token prices, but it's the foundation for the entire ecosystem to operate normally.
The economic model is also quite realistic—tokens aren't just virtual numbers created out of thin air but are genuinely involved in network operation. Nodes contributing storage resources receive incentives, and users consuming services also need to spend tokens. This design links tokens to real-world activity rather than just hype or speculation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTragedy
· 01-12 05:37
Building on quicksand—what a perfect metaphor. It perfectly describes the current state of many projects.
View OriginalReply0
ZenMiner
· 01-11 11:54
To be honest, this is what Web3 should really be about. A bunch of DeFi projects talk about storytelling every day, but the data is stored on someone else's servers. I really don't know how to feel good about calling ourselves decentralized.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastingMaximalist
· 01-11 11:53
That's right. Many projects are still just spinning stories and haven't really thought about infrastructure.
The analogy of building on quicksand is perfect. That's why I always feel something's off.
Data storage is indeed crucial, but I'm a bit skeptical whether decentralized storage protocols can really be implemented.
Only when the underlying infrastructure is stable can developers feel at ease. It's easier to say than to do.
I agree with linking tokens to the business; it's definitely better than pure scams.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-2fce706c
· 01-11 11:48
I've said it before, infrastructure is the key to wealth. Those still speculating on concepts are bound to lose out. Decentralized storage should have been deployed three years ago.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlive
· 01-11 11:48
This is the pragmatic logic, unlike that bunch that constantly hyped up air coins.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketHustler
· 01-11 11:41
That's right. The previous projects were mostly good at storytelling, but very few had real implementation. Now I understand that infrastructure is the key.
Wait, can decentralized storage really be stable, or is it just another trap?
The analogy of building on quicksand is perfect, that's exactly the point.
But honestly, short-term, these kinds of project tokens don't have much opportunity, and I don't think highly of arbitrage traders either.
Data security is indeed important, but the real challenge is how to get ordinary users to actually use it.
This time, I finally see someone doing real work, not just blowing smoke.
View OriginalReply0
ContractFreelancer
· 01-11 11:39
You're absolutely right. That bunch of projects before were just bragging and storytelling. Now I finally understand that the foundation really needs to be solid.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 01-11 11:36
To be honest, all those projects that raised funds through storytelling have now collapsed. Infrastructure is the right path.
Decentralized storage has indeed been underestimated, but the question is, who will maintain the nodes? Can the costs be controlled?
The saying "building on quicksand" hits the mark. Now I understand why so many applications failed.
I agree that tying tokens to actual business operations is better, at least it's not purely speculative tokens.
In the early stages of Web3 development, everyone focused more on speed and storytelling. But as the ecosystem gradually improves, a bunch of problems have started to surface. What's the biggest issue? Simply put, it's about where to store the data.
Think about it—if core data still relies on centralized services, then no matter how impressive the application layer is or how many creative ideas there are, the entire system still carries risks. It's like building a house on quicksand; if the foundation isn't stable, everything is pointless.
So I've recently started researching decentralized storage protocols. The idea behind these projects is straightforward—not aiming for overnight riches, but wanting to provide a reliable data infrastructure for Web3. How do they do it? By dispersing data across multiple nodes and adding verification mechanisms to ensure data integrity. This way, they avoid single points of failure and align with the long-term goal of decentralization.
For developers, a stable underlying layer means they can confidently build applications without constantly worrying about storage issues. For users, data becomes safer, and they won't lose their data if the platform suddenly goes offline. This value might not be immediately reflected in token prices, but it's the foundation for the entire ecosystem to operate normally.
The economic model is also quite realistic—tokens aren't just virtual numbers created out of thin air but are genuinely involved in network operation. Nodes contributing storage resources receive incentives, and users consuming services also need to spend tokens. This design links tokens to real-world activity rather than just hype or speculation.