In the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrency, the words and actions of a certain leading exchange founder can stir waves within the community. Although he has resigned and is facing overseas legal proceedings, market attention to his movements has never waned. Recently, he revealed a scoop — his upcoming personal memoir, tentatively titled "Binance Life" in Chinese. Once this news was announced, it immediately ignited the enthusiasm of speculators, with many guessing what insider information might be revealed, especially regarding that highly discussed experience.

Why choose this book title? The founder explained his reasoning in a statement on January 8, 2026. He proactively disclosed the proposed title to prevent misinformation or leaks. He admitted that he values the "stickiness" and cultural趣味 embedded in this name. But he also made a clear clarification: "This has nothing to do with any meme coins or trading arrangements. I have never held such coins, nor do I plan to."

Apart from the book title, there are a few details worth noting. He reserved the right to modify the title later and revealed that the English version's title would be completely different. The entire publishing plan will be self-funded, with a bilingual Chinese-English version expected to be released within 4 to 6 weeks. Most interestingly, he pledged to donate all royalties to charity, explicitly stating that this book is not for profit.

While the founder’s clarification was quite forceful, market logic prevails. Not long after the statement was issued, the existing meme coin with the same name, "Binance Life," began to surge in price, with a significant short-term increase. This phenomenon is easy to understand — in the crypto world, any information related to well-known figures can become a trigger for speculation. A name with star power, combined with the "clarification" itself, is a form of indirect promotion, resulting in various derivative coins riding the hype and prices soaring. This also reflects that market reactions are often more direct than rational analysis, and the market’s "greed" tends to be stronger than the founder’s clarifications.