The most frequently asked question recently is: who should we be positioning in the RWA track?

My view is very straightforward—don't just listen to project teams' PPT hype; reading legal documents is the real deal.

A couple of days ago, I came across some very interesting information—a publicly available "MiCA Negative Impact Disclosure Document" from a major European exchange. Honestly, the amount of information in this document far exceeds your expectations.

What is the most eye-catching discovery? In this compliance list, I actually saw a clear project aligned with the RWA direction. More importantly, the review date of the document has been updated to January 9, 2026—meaning it is still under ongoing compliance review and regulatory certification.

You might not fully grasp the significance behind this. Once the EU MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) comes into effect, over 90% of air projects and speculative tokens in the market face the risk of delisting and removal. But this project? It remains firmly on the compliance list, untouched.

This is the most straightforward meaning of "the last survivor wins."

Many people still perceive this project as just "another token issuance project," but in reality, their ambitions are entirely different. They aim to bring regulated financial markets (such as securities issuance and asset securitization) onto the blockchain—this is true financial innovation, not just hype around concepts.

Currently, the token price is repeatedly testing the bottom around $0.0599, and in the short term, there’s not much impressive performance. But if you truly understand what this compliance document represents, you’ll realize—this project’s fundamentals are already solid. EU regulatory certification is not just for show; it’s a demonstration of real strength.

Friends holding this token, the compliance ticket they’ve obtained is genuine. In the entire Web3 market, not every project is qualified to talk about this.