2026-01-11 11:20:53

Recently, the focus has been on the development and iteration of the quantitative trading platform. To be honest, the difficulty for users to set up a local environment is greater than expected—installing dependencies, modifying configurations, many people give up directly. In contrast, the web-based solution, which requires no installation and is ready to use immediately, is truly the optimal long-term solution.

Strategy development cannot be achieved overnight. Our approach is: start with scripts, then transition to local desktop tools, and finally launch the web platform. Progress step by step, continuously optimizing. The core logic is simple—it's not about making the strategy functions overly complex, but about refining each function to perfection. Simplicity is beauty, and user experience will speak for itself.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WagmiOrRekt

· 57m ago

The web version is really a must-have; the local environment setup is too discouraging.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterLucky

· 01-12 07:06

Relying on dependencies really discourages many people, and I am one of them haha The move to the web version was the right one; users simply don't want to bother. Taking gradual steps is definitely more rational than trying to eat a big meal all at once.

View OriginalReply0

PebbleHander

· 01-11 11:51

Relying on dependencies is really a deal-breaker; I've seen too many people get stuck here. The web version is indeed the right direction, it saves effort. Taking a step-by-step approach is fine; don't start with something big and comprehensive. Refining details is more important than anything else, I agree with that.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterZhang

· 01-11 11:50

Haha, the local environment setup is indeed a headache. Installing dependencies can discourage half of the users. I used to be very annoyed by it too. Free users need this kind of plug-and-play solution the most—low threshold and quick return on investment. The step-by-step approach is indeed reliable. Don't pile everything up at once; refining one feature well is better than anything else. Simple and straightforward solutions often last the longest. I've seen too many complex projects go straight to zero. When the web version goes live, remember to give me a heads-up. I'm most interested in these no-install solutions.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichVictim

· 01-11 11:42

Hmm, the web version is indeed the way to go. The local configuration setup really discourages users.

View OriginalReply0

airdrop_whisperer

· 01-11 11:30

Relying on dependencies is really a turn-off; I am one of those who gave up directly. The web version is indeed attractive, but will it take another few months to go live? Simplicity is beauty, there's nothing wrong with that, but I'm just worried that after polishing, it will still be a semi-finished product. Progressing step by step is good, but the real test is whether you can stick with it. I like this approach, moving from scripts → desktop → web, following a proper path. The current question is, when can we see a finished product in the roadmap? The no-installation feature hits the pain point perfectly; everyone who has been tortured by configurations understands.

View OriginalReply0