2026-01-11 10:26:27

There is a clear trend recently—blockchain is no longer just about decentralization stories. People are starting to face reality: to truly enter the financial sector, compliance and privacy protection are not optional but directly determine the project's survival.

RWA, institutional-grade DeFi, and other directions particularly illustrate this point. Institutional investors cannot accept completely anonymous on-chain transactions; this is obviously unrealistic. But on the other hand, freely exposing transaction data is also unacceptable—how to protect trade secrets?

This is the core issue. Some projects are addressing this pain point by embedding privacy protection and auditable mechanisms at the protocol layer, rather than patching the system after launch. This approach is closer to real financial systems—it requires verifiable privacy that can protect sensitive information while allowing regulators to trace core data.

The ecosystem development is also worth noting. Instead of following the old path of heavy subsidies to attract users, they use community incentive mechanisms to encourage participants to conduct research, write analyses, and share insights. As a result, high-quality information is generated, and the community gradually shifts from "just here for subsidies" to true co-constructors.

Currently, many projects are still in the proof-of-concept stage. Infrastructure that can unify privacy, compliance, and practical application scenarios is what truly deserves attention.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CantAffordPancake

· 01-11 10:55

Well, there's nothing wrong with what you're saying, but the problem is, how many projects are really willing to implement privacy at the protocol layer? Actually, the team needs to be capable; the patch culture is already outdated. Compliance is easy to talk about, but when it comes to real implementation, it can be a bloodbath. Institutions entering the market already require spending money to educate the market, so don't overestimate their patience. Subsidizing people is a bit of a dirty trick, but a high-quality community can't be built with just one or two incentives. Honestly, most people still aping now probably don't understand what verifiable privacy really means. This idea is correct, but execution is too easy to go astray. There are indeed many projects in the conceptual stage, but few that can survive once they are implemented. The quality of the underlying design directly determines whether they can turn things around later; at least someone is taking this seriously now.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 01-11 10:35

Finally someone has spoken clearly. The decentralized approach has been played out for a long time. Now I understand that in finance, compliance + privacy are the keys to survival. Ah, this is the right path for Web3. Not just bragging about decentralization every day. I like the idea of protecting privacy at the protocol layer. It's much more reliable than patching it after the fact. Community incentives that don't require spending money but result in higher quality? I need to think about this logic. True infrastructure should look like this. There are indeed too many projects still hyping concepts. Verifiable privacy sounds professional enough. It’s great to see institutions finally understanding this. Subsidy models should go bankrupt. Our community definitely feels a bit different this time. Balancing regulatory tracking + privacy protection is easier to talk about than to do. Let’s see how this project performs. Not to hype or criticize, but truly solving on-chain solutions for business secrets is indeed rare. This is more like real finance. Those previous projects just rushed in, and only now are they realizing the importance of compliance.

View OriginalReply0

DYORMaster

· 01-11 10:31

Compliance and privacy are really the next main battleground. We can't keep playing the old tune of "decentralization is justice." Exactly, the essence of institutional involvement is asking one question: Is my data safe on your chain? The privacy design at the protocol layer of this project is indeed quite interesting, much more reliable than those patch-after solutions. Users lured by subsidies have long since left; community-driven is the true ecosystem, right? Wait, what's the specific name of that project? For RWA, we really need to find practical infrastructure that can be implemented.

View OriginalReply0