2026-01-11 10:23:40

Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon worth paying attention to — a certain star project’s token has been declining since the beginning of this year and is still repeatedly hovering near its all-time lows. Community users pointed out that the project management’s explanation for the price decline always points to the overall bear market, and their way of handling dissenting voices is quite "efficient" — simply deleting and blocking.

Looking deeper into the operational logic of this project, the problem might be more complex. The continuous issuance mechanism leads to an ever-increasing token supply, while the value is gradually being diluted. In this model, the biggest beneficiaries are often early participants and insiders of the project. Interestingly, few other projects launched around the same time can sustain such continuous new lows — which may reflect the market’s true judgment of its fundamentals.

For investors, this is a case worth investigating thoroughly. It’s advisable to check the project’s issuance history, token flow, and genuine community feedback. Before making investment decisions, beware of projects that respond to doubts by deleting posts — projects that do this often have more to hide than what appears on the surface.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCry

· 1h ago

Deleting posts is really a brilliant move; the more you hide, the more it shows you're guilty. --- Continuous issuance and falling prices—no need for me to say more. --- Early investors made a fortune, while later ones are just being harvested for their gains. --- Still blaming the market? Brothers, no one can match your ability to hit new lows alone. --- Check the flow of funds in the trading pairs, and everything becomes clear—you can't hide it. --- I've seen too many projects that block skeptical voices, and none of them have a good ending. --- This is a classic "pump-and-dump" scheme; early bagholders are already crying. --- Just look at the contract address, and you'll see who's dumping madly.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketHustler

· 01-12 17:46

Deleting posts, I’m very familiar with this move; it’s obviously guilt. More issuance and dumping, those who bought early are smiling, while those who took over are crying. I’ve seen many projects like this; they all operate this way before running away. Unlimited issuance of supply? How can the price possibly rise... Basically, it’s just a routine to harvest the little guys. Blaming the overall market bear trend, but refusing to take responsibility for greed—pick one. Are there still people holding on stubbornly? Really, accept the loss and cut your losses, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

ForkPrince

· 01-11 10:47

The moment I deleted the post, I knew this was hopeless, to be honest. --- It's the same old trick, early investors taking huge losses. --- Continuous issuance without price increase, it all makes sense now. --- I just want to know how people are still buying into this project. --- Their explanations for the price are just annoying, shifting the blame onto the market. --- The fact that there's more hidden than what's visible is so true. --- All community feedback is deleted, typical of a guilty conscience. --- Other projects are rising while this one is falling so hard, poor taste. --- Token dilution is the most ridiculous thing. --- Early investors really became bagholders. --- I will directly avoid projects that delete comments, not touching a single cent.

View OriginalReply0

SybilSlayer

· 01-11 10:43

I usually unfollow projects that delete posts, nothing much to say about that. I've seen too many tricks with issuance mechanisms; early investors made a killing. Repeatedly hitting historical lows? Honestly, I don't even want to look. Management always blames the market, it cracks me up. In the end, these projects are just a trap for retail investors to get stuck with. Checking the token flow is the best way to spot clues—if you don't believe it, look for yourself. A project that dares to directly block criticism shows it's very insecure. Other projects at the same time aren't as manipulative; think about what that means. I'd rather miss out than touch projects that delete posts, really. Early investors in these kinds of schemes definitely made money; later entrants are just the chives.

View OriginalReply0

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 01-11 10:39

Is deleting posts all it takes? I've seen this trick too many times, wake up everyone --- Minting more tokens feels good for a moment, retail investors get cremated, nothing new --- It's that same excuse again, blaming the market downturn for the bear market, do they really think we're fools? --- Early investments doubled, later investors lost everything, this is what Web3 democracy looks like haha --- I just want to know where the money is flowing to, these data should be accessible, right? --- Don't ask me why I dislike projects that delete posts, look at how many shitcoins don't delete their posts --- Huh, hitting new lows again, really daring to perform --- That's why I only trust my own due diligence --- You see how desperately they try to explain, the more they explain, the more guilty they seem, right?

View OriginalReply0

MetaNeighbor

· 01-11 10:39

Deleting posts is a really clever move, it shows guilt --- The issuance mechanism is set up in a series, early players have already laughed out loud --- Repeatedly hitting historical lows, it’s indeed interesting... --- The more a project rushes to silence critics, the dirtier its underwear is. That’s a rule --- Other projects from the same period aren’t this bad, what does that say? --- Token dilution + topic control, I’ve seen this combo many times --- The real red flag is deleting posts; everything else is just details --- I’ve already advised everyone to stay away from this kind of project, yet some still rush in --- Explosive supply and suppressed voices, when combined, are perfect --- The problem isn’t the bear market, it’s that your own hands and feet are unclean

View OriginalReply0

IntrovertMetaverse

· 01-11 10:25

Don't touch projects that delete posts, lessons learned the hard way --- It's that same excuse of "the market is bad," fine, I believe you --- When the issuance mechanism goes off track, small retail investors become the bagholders --- Projects from the same period aren't this disastrous, what does that say --- I've seen a lot of operations where they group together to block criticism --- I laughed at those who joined early, most of the later ones are crying --- The supply has been increasing all along, and the price keeps dropping, even math students can figure it out --- You should have run before checking the issuance history, what are you waiting for --- All community voices have been deleted, there's nothing good about this project --- Dilute, dilute, and dilute again, let's see who can hold on until the end

View OriginalReply0