Do you remember how you felt when you first heard the words "stablecoin" in the crypto world? Did you think it was like a safe deposit box? Until the collapse of LUNA and UST suddenly hitting zero, at that moment, countless people realized — what’s called "stability" can sometimes be worth less than scrap paper.
Since then, whenever projects that generate stablecoins appear, many people's first reaction is: "Is this another scam? Will it collapse someday?" This mindset is completely understandable. After being burned once, who dares to trust easily?
But the problem is, you might be confusing fundamentally different things.
## Magician vs Pawnshop Owner
If I had to make an analogy, LUNA is like a smooth-talking magician, deceiving you with unrealistic promises to get you involved. Projects like Lista, on the other hand, are more like honest, straightforward pawnshops.
Imagine you urgently need money and happen to have a Rolex worth 100,000. You walk into a pawnshop.
The pawnshop owner examines your watch and then says, "This watch is good, but I can't give you full price. I need to leave some room, what if gold prices drop? I can give you at most 70,000."
You accept. The watch stays there, and you walk out with 70,000 in cash.
This is the core logic of over-collateralization. Your assets (like BNB) are worth 100,000, but the stablecoins you borrow are only 70,000. This "discount" acts as a risk buffer. Even a 30% price drop won't break it.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SatsStacking
· 01-11 10:47
Over-collateralization is indeed a different logic, but to be honest, I still have some concerns... After all, the LUNA crash was so severe that now everything seems like it could potentially explode.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 01-11 10:41
That Luna wave really gave me psychological trauma. Now I feel a bit sensitive when it comes to stablecoin projects.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterBearish
· 01-11 10:41
Pawnshops are a perfect analogy; this way, understanding stablecoins instantly removes the fear. Over-collateralization is indeed much more reliable than those air projects.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDream
· 01-11 10:40
Over-collateralization sounds good in theory, but let's be honest — the biggest fear is still that phrase "this time is different," right?
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalist
· 01-11 10:39
The Luna incident indeed taught everyone a lesson, but it doesn't make sense to demonize all stablecoins, right? The logic of over-collateralization is actually quite solid.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 01-11 10:24
Hmm, that makes sense... but the problem is, who dares to bet that the "30%" won't suddenly become 70% overnight?
## What Are You Really Afraid Of?
Do you remember how you felt when you first heard the words "stablecoin" in the crypto world? Did you think it was like a safe deposit box? Until the collapse of LUNA and UST suddenly hitting zero, at that moment, countless people realized — what’s called "stability" can sometimes be worth less than scrap paper.
Since then, whenever projects that generate stablecoins appear, many people's first reaction is: "Is this another scam? Will it collapse someday?" This mindset is completely understandable. After being burned once, who dares to trust easily?
But the problem is, you might be confusing fundamentally different things.
## Magician vs Pawnshop Owner
If I had to make an analogy, LUNA is like a smooth-talking magician, deceiving you with unrealistic promises to get you involved. Projects like Lista, on the other hand, are more like honest, straightforward pawnshops.
Imagine you urgently need money and happen to have a Rolex worth 100,000. You walk into a pawnshop.
The pawnshop owner examines your watch and then says, "This watch is good, but I can't give you full price. I need to leave some room, what if gold prices drop? I can give you at most 70,000."
You accept. The watch stays there, and you walk out with 70,000 in cash.
This is the core logic of over-collateralization. Your assets (like BNB) are worth 100,000, but the stablecoins you borrow are only 70,000. This "discount" acts as a risk buffer. Even a 30% price drop won't break it.