What many are missing is this: we've fundamentally disrupted the social contract that's existed since the agricultural era.
This isn't a small pivot. We're talking about a complete recalibration of how we should think about economics, value systems, and our role within them. Everything needs updating.
The old frameworks? They don't fit anymore. The way we conceptualize economic participation, resource distribution, financial sovereignty—all of it requires rethinking. We're not just tweaking the machine; we're redesigning it from the ground up.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PoetryOnChain
· 23h ago
NGL, this paragraph sounds very grand, but how exactly should it be changed? It's too vague.
View OriginalReply0
MevTears
· 01-10 22:46
ngl, this guy makes some good points, but the real challenge is that the old powers don't want to be redesigned at all.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 01-10 22:46
Hey, the agricultural era should be over now.
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdrop
· 01-10 22:32
NGL, the stuff from the agricultural era definitely needs to be overturned, but the real problem is that most people are simply not prepared to accept the new rules of the game.
What many are missing is this: we've fundamentally disrupted the social contract that's existed since the agricultural era.
This isn't a small pivot. We're talking about a complete recalibration of how we should think about economics, value systems, and our role within them. Everything needs updating.
The old frameworks? They don't fit anymore. The way we conceptualize economic participation, resource distribution, financial sovereignty—all of it requires rethinking. We're not just tweaking the machine; we're redesigning it from the ground up.