2026-01-10 20:43:03

The Trump administration is pushing to block U.S. courts and creditors from accessing Venezuelan oil revenue held in American jurisdiction. This move highlights the ongoing tension between political control and asset claims. For crypto and finance participants, it's a reminder of how geopolitical leverage can impact traditional asset flows and settlement mechanisms. When governments restrict access to resources—whether oil or frozen reserves—it often drives discussions about decentralized alternatives and jurisdictional risks. Worth paying attention to how these policies reshape asset custody strategies and cross-border finance dynamics.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

25 Likes

Reward
25
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Blockblind

· 16h ago

Whenever the government regulates asset flows, it's time to consider decentralized on-chain solutions. Traditional finance really can't be relied upon.

View OriginalReply0

DoomCanister

· 19h ago

Here we go again, the government's asset freeze routine. This time it's Venezuela's oil money... Basically, just a pawn in the great power game.

View OriginalReply0

HappyMinerUncle

· 01-13 12:15

Here we go again, the government pulling the same stunt, freezing assets... Isn't this just advertising for DeFi?

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-10 21:13

According to the white paper, this is the moment when the fragility of the traditional financial system is finally confirmed. The US government's asset freeze essentially proves the systemic risk of centralized custody—if the assumption holds, this will directly drive cross-border settlements to move towards decentralization. It is worth noting that on-chain data has long shown that capital is avoiding jurisdiction; now it is just a policy-level confirmation. From a tokenomics perspective, this kind of forced restriction actually serves as a negative example for DAO governance. Do you think stablecoins can replace fiat currency? That's why.

View OriginalReply0

DegenRecoveryGroup

· 01-10 21:06

Now I really can't hold it anymore. The government's asset freeze is rotten, no wonder everyone wants to move onto the chain.

View OriginalReply0

PrivacyMaximalist

· 01-10 21:05

Here we go again, the government's asset freeze routine... I've said it before, centralization is a trap. Now it's clear, isn't it?

View OriginalReply0

zkProofGremlin

· 01-10 20:58

ngl now I understand why the crypto community is so obsessed with decentralization. Once the government intervenes, assets are directly frozen. The traditional financial system may seem stable, but it's actually a political bargaining chip.

View OriginalReply0

BuyTheTop

· 01-10 20:57

Now it's good, the government has started playing the freeze game, we've seen through this trick in crypto a long time ago.

View OriginalReply0

DegenApeSurfer

· 01-10 20:55

So, the government has all the power, how can retail investors play... It's still more reliable to go on the blockchain.

View OriginalReply0