Recently, a wave of actions in the aviation industry has sparked reflections, with game theory logic bearing many similarities to the development trajectory of the crypto market.
Let's first look at the current state of the aviation sector: GE Aviation has invested in China for forty years, with global support centers and parts manufacturing bases all located in China. It owns 7,700 active engines and 4,900 spare orders, with a deeply bound market share. Boeing's China market once accounted for a quarter of its global deliveries, and the Zhoushan delivery center was originally a strategic layout. However, with the advancement of domestically produced C919, these former "monopoly advantages" are being broken—especially after the breakthrough of the CJ-1000A domestic engine, the voice in the entire ecosystem has begun to shift.
This logic applies equally to the crypto field. Currently, the global blockchain industry faces an invisible "supply disruption risk"—the development of quantum computing. Google has experimentally demonstrated that quantum computers can crack mainstream RSA-2048 encryption systems within a week. This means that most existing blockchain security mechanisms have potential vulnerabilities.
It is worth noting that domestic efforts have already made early arrangements in this area. China Telecom Quantum Group has launched an integrated solution that combines QKD (Quantum Key Distribution) and PQC (Post-Quantum Cryptography) technologies, which is becoming an important exploration direction to resist risks. Similar domestic substitution ideas are also applicable to underlying blockchain technologies—whoever masters quantum-resistant cryptographic standards first will have the advantage in the next era. At the core of this game is still the contest for technological autonomy.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Fren_Not_Food
· 01-10 15:52
Amazing, quantum computing is hanging over our heads, but the crypto world is still fighting over transaction fees.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 01-10 15:52
Quantum computing really needs to be taken seriously. As soon as Google's experiment came out, I started to panic—RSA-2048 being broken directly? Are you joking?
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 01-10 15:47
Quantum cracking is really not a small issue. We're still talking about layer 2 scaling, but little do we know that the underlying layer might need to be rebuilt.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTrendSister
· 01-10 15:42
Quantum computing is really the next bottleneck point. How many people are taking it seriously now... Domestic substitution is not just a slogan; it depends on whether the technology is truly effective.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 01-10 15:41
Once quantum computing is cracked, all private keys are just paper tigers. This time, we really need to seize the opportunity in the quantum-resistant cryptography track.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketTeam
· 01-10 15:38
Damn, quantum computing is a devil. We need to quickly equip ourselves with post-quantum cryptography boosters.
The logic of breaking through domestic engines applies to the blockchain space. Whoever first obtains the quantum resistance standard will be able to go to the moon. The time window to grab positions might not be long now.
PQC is not just icing on the cake; it's a matter of life and death. China Telecom Quantum Group has some real stuff.
Wait, RSA-2048 can be cracked within a week... Then the wallets of large holders might be compromised now. We need to find out if there are quantum-resistant wallet solutions.
This is what technological independence looks like. Don't wait until Google's quantum machines are mature and fall behind.
Recently, a wave of actions in the aviation industry has sparked reflections, with game theory logic bearing many similarities to the development trajectory of the crypto market.
Let's first look at the current state of the aviation sector: GE Aviation has invested in China for forty years, with global support centers and parts manufacturing bases all located in China. It owns 7,700 active engines and 4,900 spare orders, with a deeply bound market share. Boeing's China market once accounted for a quarter of its global deliveries, and the Zhoushan delivery center was originally a strategic layout. However, with the advancement of domestically produced C919, these former "monopoly advantages" are being broken—especially after the breakthrough of the CJ-1000A domestic engine, the voice in the entire ecosystem has begun to shift.
This logic applies equally to the crypto field. Currently, the global blockchain industry faces an invisible "supply disruption risk"—the development of quantum computing. Google has experimentally demonstrated that quantum computers can crack mainstream RSA-2048 encryption systems within a week. This means that most existing blockchain security mechanisms have potential vulnerabilities.
It is worth noting that domestic efforts have already made early arrangements in this area. China Telecom Quantum Group has launched an integrated solution that combines QKD (Quantum Key Distribution) and PQC (Post-Quantum Cryptography) technologies, which is becoming an important exploration direction to resist risks. Similar domestic substitution ideas are also applicable to underlying blockchain technologies—whoever masters quantum-resistant cryptographic standards first will have the advantage in the next era. At the core of this game is still the contest for technological autonomy.