My friend recently asked me a question: "With so many public chains, which one should I choose?" I was looking at a phone case at the time and suddenly thought—choosing a public chain is a bit like browsing the phone market.
You see, in the Android ecosystem, various brands showcase their strengths—some excel at photography, some have super high frame rates for gaming, and some are ridiculously cheap. Isn't the current public chain ecosystem similar? Ethereum is the pioneer, laying the foundation, but later users found transactions are expensive and slow; new players like Solana and Avalanche jumped in saying they are faster and cheaper, which definitely attracted many.
But here’s the problem: financial applications require something different. They don’t need a "jack of all trades," but rather specialists. Just like you wouldn’t use a regular phone for precision medical equipment, right? The financial world is actually looking for something like this—fast, absolutely secure, and most importantly, compliant.
Dusk Network is taking this route. Other public chains are competing on versatility—anything can be built, anything can be touched. But Dusk has been clear from the start about its direction: focus on financial assets and compliant interactions, dedicating all its efforts here. This choice is quite interesting because it sacrifices broad applicability for deep specialization. In terms of underlying architecture, the privacy protection aspect is handled differently—
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DecentralizedElder
· 01-09 19:54
Another promotional article urging us to go all-in on a certain chain is here again. Haha, but this analogy is indeed interesting. Even phone cases can be thought of. 🤣 Dusk sounds good, but honestly, who doesn't claim to be professional, compliant, and privacy-protecting? Let's see it truly make a splash in the financial battlefield first. Being just a specialist isn't enough; you also need an ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 01-09 19:54
Hurry, hurry, here comes another argument of "finding specialists"... Speaking of Dusk's privacy layer, it does have some features, but are you really confident about compliance? Once the risk control thresholds are loosened, a domino effect of liquidations awaits you.
View OriginalReply0
ShortingEnthusiast
· 01-09 19:53
That's right, dedicated chains are indeed the future direction. Those who are still all in on general public chains should reflect on that.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 01-09 19:33
Dusk's approach is indeed interesting, but the real question is how many people truly care about compliance...
My friend recently asked me a question: "With so many public chains, which one should I choose?" I was looking at a phone case at the time and suddenly thought—choosing a public chain is a bit like browsing the phone market.
You see, in the Android ecosystem, various brands showcase their strengths—some excel at photography, some have super high frame rates for gaming, and some are ridiculously cheap. Isn't the current public chain ecosystem similar? Ethereum is the pioneer, laying the foundation, but later users found transactions are expensive and slow; new players like Solana and Avalanche jumped in saying they are faster and cheaper, which definitely attracted many.
But here’s the problem: financial applications require something different. They don’t need a "jack of all trades," but rather specialists. Just like you wouldn’t use a regular phone for precision medical equipment, right? The financial world is actually looking for something like this—fast, absolutely secure, and most importantly, compliant.
Dusk Network is taking this route. Other public chains are competing on versatility—anything can be built, anything can be touched. But Dusk has been clear from the start about its direction: focus on financial assets and compliant interactions, dedicating all its efforts here. This choice is quite interesting because it sacrifices broad applicability for deep specialization. In terms of underlying architecture, the privacy protection aspect is handled differently—