2026-01-09 19:23:12

The liquidity depth of the Avalanche ecosystem has一直是 a pain point restricting trading experience. The true solution needs to achieve three points: reliable trading depth, intelligent routing management, and stable and predictable transaction efficiency.

Now, DeFi users' expectations for these basic requirements are increasing. Especially when you frequently trade different trading pairs, participate in governance voting, or perform liquidity staking, the slippage and costs of each transaction will directly affect the收益.

A good design should allow users to focus on the strategy itself, rather than repeatedly adjusting parameters. This is the long-term sustainable approach to liquidity building.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Rekt_Recovery

· 11h ago

ngl avax liquidity issues hit different when you're bleeding slippage on every swap... been there, lost count of how many times i've watched my positions get liquidated because routing was absolute dogshit. anyway the whole depth + smart routing thing sounds nice in theory but we all know builders gonna builder, right?

Reply0

DevChive

· 11h ago

Slippage kills me. Every time I trade, I have to fight with the parameters. So annoying.

View OriginalReply0

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 01-12 04:53

Slippage issues are indeed annoying, but I think Avalanche's current liquidity dilemma is not a design flaw at all; it's just that there are too few ecosystem projects... Looking at the data, the depth of trading pairs is an order of magnitude lower than Arbitrum, which is a structural defect.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-6bc33122

· 01-09 19:52

Slippage is really intense; every time I trade, I have to carefully adjust the parameters. It's so annoying.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaOnTheRun

· 01-09 19:51

Slippage is really annoying, I have to manually adjust the parameters every time.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e51e87c7

· 01-09 19:49

These three points are well said, but Avalanche is still a long way to go. --- Slippage really can drive people crazy; every time it has to be adjusted manually... --- Good routing management can indeed significantly improve returns. Looking forward to seeing specific plans. --- It sounds nice, but ultimately it depends on who can truly implement it. --- Liquidity issues should have been solved long ago; otherwise, how can we compete with other chains? --- Honestly, parameter adjustments are too tedious; automation must be promoted. --- Smart routing is the key; the other two are just auxiliary. --- I agree with the idea of sustainable development, but at this stage, real financial incentives are still necessary. --- Lack of depth is just that—no matter how fancy the design, it can't save the situation.

View OriginalReply0

ContractTearjerker

· 01-09 19:46

Slippage killer, battling with trading depth every day... Avalanche really needs to get serious about this.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuru

· 01-09 19:40

Avalanche's liquidity issues are still a recurring topic no matter how much it's discussed. When will there be real improvements?

View OriginalReply0

MerkleDreamer

· 01-09 19:40

Slippage killer, huh? Tuning parameters every day is so annoying.

View OriginalReply0

NullWhisperer

· 01-09 19:30

ngl the routing layer on avalanche is theoretically exploitable if liquidity fragments too badly... depth issue isn't really a feature, it's just bad infrastructure theater at this point

Reply0