I'm locking in my XP tokens for Season II through Ethos Validators. After looking around for the right validator to delegate to, I settled on Ethos Validator #164 for this cycle.



Choosingthe right validator matters—you want someone who actually understands the network and makes sound decisions for delegators. That's why I'm putting my XP with this one. The validator selection process isn't just about picking a name; it's about trusting the person behind it to execute well.

If you're thinking about staking XP yourself, take time to research which validator aligns with your expectations. The quality of delegation can affect your rewards and network experience.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NightAirdroppervip
· 01-12 18:03
Choosing a good validator is really crucial... I'm also torn, #164 sounds good but I need to dig into the background myself.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObservervip
· 01-12 16:57
Choosing a good validator can really save you trouble. I'm currently looking at #164 as well, and I feel this guy is indeed reliable.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580vip
· 01-09 18:53
The data shows that the choice of validators directly affects the annualized return... How has the historical performance of #164 been? Are there specific data?
View OriginalReply0
MaticHoleFillervip
· 01-09 18:51
Choosing a good validator can really reduce worries. How about #164? Have you heard of it before?
View OriginalReply0
CodeSmellHuntervip
· 01-09 18:40
Looking at your choice of #164, the details are quite thoughtful. But honestly, being a validator still depends on your own research... Relying solely on others' recommendations can easily lead to pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSweaterFanvip
· 01-09 18:40
Reliable validation nodes are the real deal, and #164 is a good choice.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 01-09 18:36
NGL, choosing a validator can definitely be tricky... Is #164 a good choice? I think a hands-on inspection is necessary.
View OriginalReply0
MevHuntervip
· 01-09 18:26
Hey, 164 is a pretty good choice. I'm also looking at this validator, I heard their block production rate is quite stable...
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)