2026-01-09 17:30:18

The Optimism Foundation has launched a new initiative to directly link the revenue flow of the Superchain ecosystem with the value of the OP token. This idea is quite interesting— the proposal suggests using 50% of the Superchain income for OP token repurchases, thereby strengthening the token's value support.

From a token economic model perspective, this is a very pragmatic move. The buyback mechanism can directly hedge against market sell pressure, while also sending a signal to the market: network growth will directly benefit token holders. In other words, the better the Superchain ecosystem performs, the more OP holders stand to gain.

This design creates a closer alignment of interests between ecosystem participants and token value, potentially better incentivizing the community and developers to commit long-term to this Layer 2 ecosystem. Of course, the execution details and market response will depend on subsequent developments.

OP-0,15%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SignatureLiquidator

· 13h ago

Buyback OP? Now the ecosystem growth is tied directly to the coin price, the calculations are extremely clever.

View OriginalReply0

ChainComedian

· 22h ago

50% buyback, this tactic is indeed sophisticated. But don't just look at the positive news, you need to ask whether it can be truly executed effectively. --- It's the same old story of ecological interest binding. It sounds good, but it still depends on the team's execution capability. --- OP holders are increasingly able to benefit from ecological gains, which is the real token economics. --- The path of buyback hedging selling pressure is something all L2s want to pursue. The key is who can stick to it. --- Gotta say, optimism's move is quite clever, directly tying ecological growth to token value. --- Using 50% for buyback? Still feels like we need to see real data later; don’t let it turn into an empty check. --- Interesting, this way developers are more motivated since they can also profit from a healthy ecosystem. --- By the way, can this model truly motivate developers, or does it just look good on the surface? --- Optimism is learning how to align token holders with the ecological direction; the approach is indeed quite good.

View OriginalReply0

IntrovertMetaverse

· 01-09 17:58

Finally, a project dares to directly distribute profits to token holders. This is the right way. --- 50% buyback? Sounds good, just wait and see how the OP Foundation executes it. --- Now, whether the ecosystem is good or not is directly linked to my wallet, the pressure is immense haha. --- Why don't other L2s do the same? Does Optimism want to do something different? --- Profit binding is indeed top-notch; buybacks are the way to go. --- It sounds good, but the reality of execution is another matter. --- I give this move by OP a seven out of ten, but it depends on whether they can maintain it later.

View OriginalReply0

DaoGovernanceOfficer

· 01-09 17:58

ngl, the 50% buyback mechanic is just tokenomics theater if governance can't actually enforce it... where's the accountability framework here?

Reply0

DecentralizeMe

· 01-09 17:56

Isn't it just a disguised market rescue, with a 50% buyback... sounds good, but can it really boost the market? It still depends on whether the ecosystem can truly generate that much revenue; otherwise, it's just empty talk. Honestly, this move is really friendly to existing token holders, but new entrants will just have to wait to be cut. If OP continues like this, might as well make it a dividend token. It sounds nice, but ultimately, the community really needs to use it actively.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-09 17:54

The buyback move is truly awesome. It's finally more than just a slogan. OP holders are in luck.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuyer

· 01-09 17:46

50% buyback? That's a bold move. Finally, a project willing to directly distribute ecosystem profits to token holders, no more empty promises. But the key is execution. Only real implementation counts; no more paper promises. OP's strategy is quite good; aligning interests is essential for everyone to work together.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDoomsDay

· 01-09 17:45

50% buyback? That's a decent move, better than those who just shout slogans. But the key is whether they can really follow through, or it will just be another abandoned project.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretDiary

· 01-09 17:39

I wonder if this buyback mechanism can really stabilize OP... I just want to know. OP fans are excited again. Good news is good news, but let's see if it can really be implemented properly before jumping to conclusions. A 50% buyback sounds pretty attractive, but I'm worried it might just be a "paper benefit." This gives token holders some assurance, but how the market reacts still depends. How long can the buyback last? That's the key question. Profit binding sounds good, but whether it can withstand a decline in token price is the real challenge. OP's logical closed-loop is indeed well-designed, but the execution... hmm. Finally, there's a somewhat decent tokenomics design. Growing the ecosystem while conducting buybacks—if implemented properly, it could create a positive cycle. It feels like OP is making a long-term strategic move.

View OriginalReply0