2026-01-09 17:26:42

RWA has indeed been heating up recently, especially when you see projects directly bringing over 800 million in physical assets onto the chain. Taking WAL as an example, this project is anchored by real estate and commodities, with a stable daily trading volume of over $18 million and a daily token consumption of 450,000 tokens. With these figures, liquidity is simply not an issue.

What truly attracts institutional investors? It's not just about conceptual packaging, but the dual insurance system of multi-node notarization combined with compliance endorsement. The efficiency of asset rights confirmation has increased fivefold. What does this mean? It means that from on-chain verification to the actual delivery of assets, intermediate steps are significantly compressed, greatly reducing risk. Over 30 institutions have already entered the derivatives market, indicating that major players have already seen through the potential of this track.

The most interesting part is the staking mechanism — not only can you earn yields, but you also gain governance rights. This design turns token holders into ecosystem participants rather than just passive asset holders. In the context of abundant liquidity, institutions are indeed rushing to acquire such assets with real-world backing and tangible support. The point of explosive value is right in front of us.

RWA1,29%

WAL-5,77%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SquidTeacher

· 01-09 17:56

Looking at WAL's data, it's indeed solid; an average daily trading volume of $18 million is no joke. The question is, how long can this kind of project last? RWA is hot, but how many are truly implemented? I'm more concerned about whether those 30+ institutions are genuinely strategic or just hyping concepts. The combination of staking + governance is indeed clever, but it depends on whether the token has real value support; otherwise, it's just a game of musical chairs. The claim that asset rights confirmation efficiency has increased fivefold sounds great, but whether it can actually be implemented still needs market verification. Speaking of this round of RWA, it feels like another wave of harvesting opportunities. Be careful not to become the bag holder.

View OriginalReply0

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 01-09 17:55

According to my quantitative model follow-up, WAL's data is indeed good, but don't be fooled by the daily average of 18 million—assets like this are easily overestimated during periods of loose liquidity in market cycles. Historical data shows that institutional accumulation often signals a top. Thirty institutions are deploying derivatives? Risk warning: this is precisely the false prosperity before the bottom is formed.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoWageSlave

· 01-09 17:48

Damn, this data is really not exaggerated. Who can handle a daily trading volume of 18 million yen? Institutions are all buying the dip of this kind of thing, which shows there’s definitely something there. Can staking also grant governance rights? I need to think about this design. Wait, how is the 5x efficiency increase verified? Could it be another concept hype? But physical backing is indeed much more reliable than those air coins. This time, it might really be different.

View OriginalReply0

GreenCandleCollector

· 01-09 17:48

Wow, 800 million assets on the chain? This data must be legit, not just on paper. What does the institution's layout of derivatives indicate? It shows that this thing can really be implemented, not just another round of hype. Staking can also earn governance rights. This design is a bit aggressive, finally not just a simple leek box.

View OriginalReply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 01-09 17:47

Multi-node proof of existence sounds good, but I am more concerned about whether the re-entrancy attack vectors in smart contracts are completely blocked. The claim of a 5x increase in asset rights confirmation efficiency sounds great, but the question is whether the intermediate steps have been compressed, and if the risk has truly been reduced or just shifted elsewhere.

View OriginalReply0

RooftopVIP

· 01-09 17:46

800 million in assets on the chain sounds impressive, but the real beneficiaries are still those 30+ institutions, while retail investors are just the scapegoats.

View OriginalReply0