Recently, I noticed a phenomenon: some projects rely on solid fundraising backgrounds and institutional support to quickly gain attention in the market. This made me reflect on why some early-stage projects can attract top-tier funding.
After examining a funding case in detail, I feel it’s worth analyzing. In terms of background, the project received lead investment from Cumberland, with follow-on investments from top-tier institutions such as Coinbase Ventures, HashKey, and Circle, with a total funding of $6.8 million. This kind of funding combination is very convincing in itself—being able to attract such top-tier institutions simultaneously indicates that the project’s review process is not easy.
The identity of the investors is very important. Cumberland, as a well-known digital asset investment firm, Coinbase Ventures, backed by a compliant exchange ecosystem, HashKey, and Circle all have deep experience in payments and finance. Their joint endorsement, to some extent, reflects the credibility of the project in terms of technology, team, and business logic.
This type of funding model is worth paying attention to, as it reflects the current trend in the Web3 ecosystem where institutional investors are increasingly valuing the actual value of projects rather than just hype.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StakeHouseDirector
· 01-09 17:50
Well... to be honest, the fact that institutions are rushing in does indicate some issues, but don't be too naive.
Nowadays, everyone wants to latch onto big players. $6.8 million sounds good, but it's just so-so. The key is that these institutions are also gambling themselves.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 01-09 17:50
I've seen through the thing about institutions banding together a long time ago. To put it simply, it's just those big players giving each other face.
View OriginalReply0
BlockTalk
· 01-09 17:46
ngl this funding list is indeed luxurious, but I'm more concerned about how they are going to spend the money
View OriginalReply0
PositionPhobia
· 01-09 17:45
Nah, this is just how VCs endorse each other. The nice way to put it is "review threshold," but honestly, it's just playing within the circle.
View OriginalReply0
StableBoi
· 01-09 17:42
To be honest, this funding list is indeed impressive. A group like Cumberland and Coinbase Ventures doesn't just casually invest 6.8 million, but it still depends on what the team specifically plans to do.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetector
· 01-09 17:25
Haha, this funding list really packs a punch. Cumberland + Coinbase collaboration shows that the project itself isn't that weak.
Recently, I noticed a phenomenon: some projects rely on solid fundraising backgrounds and institutional support to quickly gain attention in the market. This made me reflect on why some early-stage projects can attract top-tier funding.
After examining a funding case in detail, I feel it’s worth analyzing. In terms of background, the project received lead investment from Cumberland, with follow-on investments from top-tier institutions such as Coinbase Ventures, HashKey, and Circle, with a total funding of $6.8 million. This kind of funding combination is very convincing in itself—being able to attract such top-tier institutions simultaneously indicates that the project’s review process is not easy.
The identity of the investors is very important. Cumberland, as a well-known digital asset investment firm, Coinbase Ventures, backed by a compliant exchange ecosystem, HashKey, and Circle all have deep experience in payments and finance. Their joint endorsement, to some extent, reflects the credibility of the project in terms of technology, team, and business logic.
This type of funding model is worth paying attention to, as it reflects the current trend in the Web3 ecosystem where institutional investors are increasingly valuing the actual value of projects rather than just hype.