2026-01-09 16:29:37

CLO this coin, everyone spends all day studying resistance levels and support levels, but from 0.3 to 4.5, how many times have "professionals" called the top and marked resistance levels, only to be broken through time and time again? Instead of saying this is technical analysis, it's more like an obvious game rule—you know I know, and those whales also know you know.

Here's a real-world analogy: Suppose you're playing big or small, and you really hold a 3.0 in your hand, and you go all in. The other party is the dealer, and they see your cards clearly. Do you think they would be foolish enough to play according to probability? No. They might play a 2 to help you make money, or a 4 to cut you. When they cut depends on when it’s most profitable for them.

This is not to deny technical analysis itself, but in highly concentrated coins, these things are like illusions to retail investors. The real logic of making money often isn't in the K-line, but in what the opponent is thinking.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-e51e87c7

· 01-12 15:59

Oh well, it's still all about information advantage. Technical analysis is just a joke in front of the big players.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-12 02:40

Basically, technical analysis is a joke in front of the big players. Who hasn't been cut during this wave from 0.3 to 4.5? Retail investors study support and resistance levels, but the big players directly break through your psychological defenses—that's the real game rule. For highly concentrated coins like CLO, looking at candlestick charts is purely self-delusion; the key is to guess when the big players will make their move. Being called a top countless times but still soaring all the way up—you should have realized by now that technical analysis is all a lie. Playing with coins ultimately comes down to a psychological battle; it's not about those fake support and resistance levels. The big players hold transparent cards, while retail investors play blind bets—that's the current state of Web3.

View OriginalReply0

MEV_Whisperer

· 01-12 00:57

No need to point it out, most people are still figuring out what the hell pressure levels are. --- Damn, that analogy is perfect. When the market maker can see your cards, it's a whole different game. --- Technical analysis is just a facade for small retail investors, really. --- From 0.3 to 4.5, how many people were calling the top and getting wrecked, haha. --- What sounds beautiful is called a mirage; what’s less nice is being cut as a leek. --- So ultimately, you still have to guess what the market maker is thinking—that’s how you make money. --- This coin’s game rules are just like that; the sooner you see through it, the less you lose. --- Candlestick charts can’t fool anyone; they only deceive those who believe in indicators. --- The most outrageous part about concentrated coins is that people get cut every day while still researching support levels.

View OriginalReply0

Anon32942

· 01-09 16:50

0.3 to 4.5, the resistance levels have been broken countless times. What does that mean? Technical analysis is just a decoration in front of the big players. --- Everyone is watching the K-line, but they don’t realize that the other side has already seen through your cards. --- The analogy of playing big or small is perfect. Retail investors studying support levels is like studying air; the opponent simply doesn’t follow the rules. --- Instead of trusting resistance levels, ask yourself: when do the big players cut the most comfortably? --- The phrase "mirage" is used brilliantly. Technical analysis for small investors is just a placebo. --- How many people got trapped after falling from 4.5? Still watching the K-line—truly hopeless. --- In highly concentrated coins, doing technical analysis makes you the one holding the obvious card with three points. --- The problem isn’t with the technical analysis; it’s that the opponent always sees one step ahead of you.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 01-09 16:48

Really, looking at CLO from 0.3 to 4.5, how many times have I been fooled? Every time they say it's the top, but then it gets pushed up again—so ridiculous. My older brother is right; retail traders analyzing those charts are just comforting themselves. The big players don't follow your logic at all. It's just a gamble—waiting to see when the big players want to cut their losses. There's no technical analysis involved. That's just how the game is played. Knowing it doesn't help; you're still being completely trapped. A couple of days ago, I saw someone calling out a certain resistance level, and I just laughed. This time, it was smashed through again. The key is to look at the distribution of chips; forget about studying candlestick charts. Think about what the big players are thinking.

View OriginalReply0

NewPumpamentals

· 01-09 16:40

It's harsh but true; technical analysis is just a pretext to trap retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

BrightWarrior168

· 01-09 16:34

Yes, under the manipulation tactics of the dog whales, all technical analysis is useless. The more you understand, the easier it is to get trapped deeper.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletGuardian

· 01-09 16:31

Honestly, I got caught once during this 0.3 to 4.5 wave. Those shouting about resistance levels really should shut up. The market makers don't follow any rules; just by looking at the charts, you can tell who is controlling the funds. Instead of studying technical analysis, it's better to understand the market makers' mindset. The problem is, how do you know when they will cut? That's why I now only follow leading coins. Small coin traders are more prone to panic. Technical analysis is a joke in coins with high control; retail investors can never guess the next move.

View OriginalReply0