Many so-called blockchain projects, no matter how well they are presented, are just displays. "Decentralization" has become a marketing slogan, but decision-making power still remains in the hands of the project team, and users have no rights at all.
However, Walrus has taken a different path. Its governance mechanism is straightforward: holding WAL tokens allows participation in voting decisions. The larger the holding, the greater the say. Key project matters—such as storage fee rates, feature priorities, validator rules, and ecosystem fund usage—all require community voting. This completely breaks the "the project team makes all decisions" situation.
Transparency is well handled. All proposals are publicly displayed on the community platform, with clear explanations of background, implementation impact, and expected results. Voting is recorded on-chain throughout, unchangeable, and everyone can see the results. Even if you hold only a small amount of WAL, as long as your reasons are solid, you can still propose and gain support.
Participating in governance yields tangible rewards. Voting can determine the ecosystem's direction, making the platform more aligned with user needs. More attractively, active governance participants can also receive additional WAL rewards. This design of "having a say and earning rewards" naturally stimulates user engagement and creates a positive feedback loop.
For enterprise-level users, this mechanism is even more appealing. Long-term users of Walrus storage services? Holding WAL allows participation in voting to push for platform development of more enterprise-friendly features—such as batch processing, customized privacy solutions, and so on—making the service truly tailored to their needs.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FloorPriceWatcher
· 2h ago
The concept of governance tokens sounds good, but I'm worried that in the end, it's still the big players calling the shots.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiSherpa
· 10h ago
I feel like Walrus has truly implemented governance this time, not just paying lip service to slogans.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationKing
· 01-09 16:53
Finally, I see projects taking decentralization seriously, not just a slogan.
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlIt
· 01-09 16:53
It's that same old trick of "participate if there's a reward," and in the end, it's still the big players calling the shots.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnon
· 01-09 16:52
To be honest, projects that truly give voting rights to the community are already scarce, and Walrus's mechanism definitely has some merit.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMaster
· 01-09 16:41
Really, most projects are just paper tigers; no matter how loudly they boast, it’s useless.
Walrus is indeed a bit different; it doesn’t play tricks with governance. You can vote directly with tokens, which is straightforward.
That said, the incentive mechanism is still somewhat interesting; participating can earn WAL, which is much more reliable than just airdrops.
As long as it’s not another project where the team secretly manipulates the system.
This time, it looks quite honest; on-chain voting records can’t be altered or faked.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_whisperer
· 01-09 16:36
Is it truly decentralized, or is it just a scythe changing angles to cut? It depends on whether large investors are manipulating the votes behind the scenes.
View OriginalReply0
MevHunter
· 01-09 16:35
Hey, this mechanism sounds good, but it depends on the actual voting participation rate.
Many so-called blockchain projects, no matter how well they are presented, are just displays. "Decentralization" has become a marketing slogan, but decision-making power still remains in the hands of the project team, and users have no rights at all.
However, Walrus has taken a different path. Its governance mechanism is straightforward: holding WAL tokens allows participation in voting decisions. The larger the holding, the greater the say. Key project matters—such as storage fee rates, feature priorities, validator rules, and ecosystem fund usage—all require community voting. This completely breaks the "the project team makes all decisions" situation.
Transparency is well handled. All proposals are publicly displayed on the community platform, with clear explanations of background, implementation impact, and expected results. Voting is recorded on-chain throughout, unchangeable, and everyone can see the results. Even if you hold only a small amount of WAL, as long as your reasons are solid, you can still propose and gain support.
Participating in governance yields tangible rewards. Voting can determine the ecosystem's direction, making the platform more aligned with user needs. More attractively, active governance participants can also receive additional WAL rewards. This design of "having a say and earning rewards" naturally stimulates user engagement and creates a positive feedback loop.
For enterprise-level users, this mechanism is even more appealing. Long-term users of Walrus storage services? Holding WAL allows participation in voting to push for platform development of more enterprise-friendly features—such as batch processing, customized privacy solutions, and so on—making the service truly tailored to their needs.