Two senior executives from a16z Crypto recently offered a key piece of advice to crypto developers: don’t rush into trading platforms. Behind this seemingly simple suggestion lies a deeper industry issue at this stage of development—everyone is pursuing the same path, which increases the risk of pitfalls.
Industry Status Quo: A Mass Shift Toward Trading Business
According to the latest news, Arianna Simpson, general partner at a16z Crypto, observed that apart from stablecoins and core infrastructure, most successful crypto companies are transitioning into trading platforms. This sounds like a wise choice, as trading can indeed generate revenue. But the problem lies precisely here—when everyone does the same thing, it ceases to be a competitive advantage and instead becomes a competitive disadvantage.
Why is this a trap
Simpson pointed out that this homogenized competition will weaken most companies’ market attention. In other words, when a hundred companies are all building trading platforms, user and capital attention will be divided more and more finely. Ultimately, only a few winners will emerge, and the rest will become mediocre.
More importantly, founders rushing into trading may miss opportunities to build more defensible and sustainable businesses. Trading platforms seem to make quick money, but fundamentally they are highly competitive and easily replicated. Truly moat-worthy businesses often come from companies focused on the product itself and solving real needs.
Characteristics of the big winners
Simpson’s view is clear: developers who focus on the product itself rather than just trading functions may become bigger winners in the end. What does this mean?
Direction Comparison
Trading Platform Model
Product-Oriented Model
Competition Intensity
Very high, easy to homogenize
Relatively controllable, large differentiation space
Moat
Weak, easily copied
Strong, builds user stickiness
Long-term Value
Depends on traffic and trading volume
Depends on product innovation and ecosystem
Market Attention
Easy to be drowned out
Easier to stand out
Another Key Suggestion: Regulatory Compliance
a16z Crypto’s policy team and chief legal counsel Miles Jennings proposed another dimension: developers should focus on regulatory compliance.
Jennings stated that the Trump administration is closer than ever to passing legislation regulating crypto market structures. If passed, this law will promote transparency and establish clear standards, creating a straightforward path for fundraising, token issuance, and decentralization.
This signal is very important. Regulation is no longer a flood of chaos but a force that can bring order and opportunity. Projects that proactively establish compliance foundations may gain advantages in the future.
The Industry Logic Behind It
These two suggestions actually reflect a16z’s judgment on the development stage of the crypto industry. According to related information, a16z Crypto’s latest outlook report indicates that future development in crypto will no longer mainly rely on new blockchains but will focus more on how technology changes markets, computing infrastructure, and media.
In other words, the industry is shifting from “infrastructure expansion” to “application and value capture.” In this transition, those who can:
Focus on solving real problems with their products
Build strong community consensus
Proactively adapt to regulatory frameworks
are the ones with real prospects.
Summary
a16z’s advice can be summarized in two points: first, don’t be tempted by short-term gains from trading platforms; homogenized competition will only cause most to fall behind. Second, actively embrace regulatory compliance—this is not a restriction but a future competitive advantage.
For developers, this means adopting a longer-term perspective. The path to quick profits may be crowded, but teams that persist in building quality products and creating real user value may stand out in the next phase. This is not a new suggestion, but in the current industry’s restless atmosphere, a reminder from top-tier venture capitalists is especially valuable.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Homogenization Trap: Why a16z Discourages Developers from Moving to Trading Platforms
Two senior executives from a16z Crypto recently offered a key piece of advice to crypto developers: don’t rush into trading platforms. Behind this seemingly simple suggestion lies a deeper industry issue at this stage of development—everyone is pursuing the same path, which increases the risk of pitfalls.
Industry Status Quo: A Mass Shift Toward Trading Business
According to the latest news, Arianna Simpson, general partner at a16z Crypto, observed that apart from stablecoins and core infrastructure, most successful crypto companies are transitioning into trading platforms. This sounds like a wise choice, as trading can indeed generate revenue. But the problem lies precisely here—when everyone does the same thing, it ceases to be a competitive advantage and instead becomes a competitive disadvantage.
Why is this a trap
Simpson pointed out that this homogenized competition will weaken most companies’ market attention. In other words, when a hundred companies are all building trading platforms, user and capital attention will be divided more and more finely. Ultimately, only a few winners will emerge, and the rest will become mediocre.
More importantly, founders rushing into trading may miss opportunities to build more defensible and sustainable businesses. Trading platforms seem to make quick money, but fundamentally they are highly competitive and easily replicated. Truly moat-worthy businesses often come from companies focused on the product itself and solving real needs.
Characteristics of the big winners
Simpson’s view is clear: developers who focus on the product itself rather than just trading functions may become bigger winners in the end. What does this mean?
Another Key Suggestion: Regulatory Compliance
a16z Crypto’s policy team and chief legal counsel Miles Jennings proposed another dimension: developers should focus on regulatory compliance.
Jennings stated that the Trump administration is closer than ever to passing legislation regulating crypto market structures. If passed, this law will promote transparency and establish clear standards, creating a straightforward path for fundraising, token issuance, and decentralization.
This signal is very important. Regulation is no longer a flood of chaos but a force that can bring order and opportunity. Projects that proactively establish compliance foundations may gain advantages in the future.
The Industry Logic Behind It
These two suggestions actually reflect a16z’s judgment on the development stage of the crypto industry. According to related information, a16z Crypto’s latest outlook report indicates that future development in crypto will no longer mainly rely on new blockchains but will focus more on how technology changes markets, computing infrastructure, and media.
In other words, the industry is shifting from “infrastructure expansion” to “application and value capture.” In this transition, those who can:
are the ones with real prospects.
Summary
a16z’s advice can be summarized in two points: first, don’t be tempted by short-term gains from trading platforms; homogenized competition will only cause most to fall behind. Second, actively embrace regulatory compliance—this is not a restriction but a future competitive advantage.
For developers, this means adopting a longer-term perspective. The path to quick profits may be crowded, but teams that persist in building quality products and creating real user value may stand out in the next phase. This is not a new suggestion, but in the current industry’s restless atmosphere, a reminder from top-tier venture capitalists is especially valuable.