2026-01-06 15:30:05

A recent interesting phenomenon—since major exchanges opened high-yield financial products, many people have turned their attention to lending platforms like ListaDAO on the BNB Chain. They use BTCB, PT-USDe, or slisBNB in combination with BNB as collateral, then lend out USD1 to participate in yield farming.

What’s the result? The lendable assets in some lending pools have been almost completely snatched up, and the official sources are continuously adding liquidity. What does this indicate? It’s not that on-chain lending has really cooled down, but rather that there is a lack of obvious arbitrage opportunities that can generate profits. Once a clear yield difference appears, funds rush in immediately. The market’s intuition has always been very sharp.

BNB-0,78%

USDE0,03%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NewDAOdreamer

· 01-09 15:14

Haha, basically it's just about the smell of money. Without a clear arbitrage gap, I stay flat; as soon as there's an opportunity, I jump in.

View OriginalReply0

0xTherapist

· 01-09 14:18

Funds always flow towards profits, this is no longer news. When arbitrage opportunities appear, everyone rushes in, indicating that everyone is waiting for that moment. This round of ListaDAO's gameplay is indeed quite interesting, and it was truly snapped up quickly. Lending is not dead; it's just waiting for the right opportunity.

View OriginalReply0

CoinBasedThinking

· 01-09 08:53

Here we go again, whenever there's a profit gap, everyone rushes in. Truly, the ability to sniff out profits is even sharper than a dog's. The USD1 scheme has long been seen through; now we're just waiting for the next hot trend. The liquidity on ListaDAO has been completely drained, what does that indicate? It still can't escape the word "arbitrage." On-chain lending hasn't died; it's just that the returns aren't attractive enough. That's how funds behave. When the major exchanges announce profits, small arbitrage opportunities like this are instantly eliminated. The market is so ruthless. I just want to know, as this cycle continues, who can seize the next clear profit gap? That's the real key to making money.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-07 00:13

This trick is obvious at a glance. To put it simply, it's funds playing hide and seek—where there's money to be made, everyone rushes there. The liquidity being drained is actually quite normal; now it's just a matter of who reacts quickly. Once the profit-making effect appears, everyone immediately jumps in, truly showcasing the market's sharpness. This round of operations must be said to be a signal—it's not that lending is truly cold, but just waiting for the right opportunity. The USD1 collateralized lending play is indeed interesting, but it also carries significant risks. Funds are being drained so quickly? It shows that everyone is watching this area. It looks like another round of yield arbitrage game—let's wait and see who gets caught last.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOmonster

· 01-06 15:59

Funds are never idle; they jump in whenever there's profit. ListaDAO is indeed competing, but to be honest, it's still a low-yield game. Without a price difference, no one moves.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHermit