2026-01-06 13:22:29

Crypto communities love playing favorites. AI-written content? They'll trash it as 'lazy slop.' But AI-assisted code? Suddenly it's 'genius vibes.' The double standard is wild. Here's the thing though—forget the noise most of the time. Seriously. Do what actually moves the needle for you. Whether you use tools or not, results speak louder than tweets anyway.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

quiet_lurker

· 01-09 00:44

Forget it, this double standard is indeed incredible, but who cares? In the end, it's all about the results.

View OriginalReply0

MaticHoleFiller

· 01-08 16:51

Results are king; don't listen to those loud-mouthed fools talking nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

VitaliksTwin

· 01-06 17:58

The double standard phenomenon definitely exists, but that's human nature. Just accept it.

View OriginalReply0

ContractExplorer

· 01-06 13:50

That's right, the double standards are too obvious. Using AI to write articles gets criticized, using AI to write code gets praised—this community is really interesting.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretDiary

· 01-06 13:50

Exactly right, double standards are really common in the crypto world. Articles that criticize the code are looked down upon, while those that praise it are hyped up. LOL

View OriginalReply0

SignatureVerifier

· 01-06 13:47

the cognitive dissonance here is actually fascinating from a validation standpoint. folks reject ai text but worship ai code without bothering to audit either. insufficient rigor across the board tbh

Reply0

Rugpull幸存者

· 01-06 13:47

Uh... this double standard is incredible, but to be honest, I've seen through it a long time ago.

View OriginalReply0

OnChain_Detective

· 01-06 13:42

ngl the double standard thing is sus as hell. let me pattern match this real quick—community accepts ai when it's *useful* to them, rejects it when it's *visible*. classic cognitive bias. flagged this behavior before in token voting patterns, same statistical signature honestly

Reply0

PseudoIntellectual