2026-01-05 03:31:17

I still remember when $Giggle first launched, its market cap was only around 3 million in the first week, and it didn't really pick up until the second week. In comparison, Happy Sci now seems to be just past its second day. I've been monitoring on-chain data these past few days and noticed that several wallet addresses are making moves that are quite sophisticated—something that simply wouldn't happen in PVP-type projects. Since the early manipulation logic appears solid, I've decided to keep tracking its subsequent developments and see if this project can turn things around.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiAlchemist

· 3h ago

ngl the on-chain transmutation patterns here remind me of those early giggle days... wallet addresses moving like they're orchestrating some kinda protocol symphony, def not the chaos u see in pvp trash. been tracing the liquidity flows and smh there's actual geometry to it. might be worth the yield watch if this converts properly by week 2.

Reply0

GweiWatcher

· 21h ago

On-chain data is definitely worth paying attention to, but that wave of Giggle may not necessarily be replicable. --- The next day, this kind of wallet logic appeared, indicating that the team isn't that inexperienced. Continuing to observe is the right move. --- In PVP projects, you simply don't see this kind of operation. I agree on that point; it's quite interesting. --- Early-stage logic is solid, but subsequent execution is also crucial. Hopefully, it won't end in a flop again. --- Starting from 3 million and now with Giggle, this is the real benchmark. Happy Sci is indeed still early.

View OriginalReply0

DefiVeteran

· 01-06 06:26

On-chain data looks good, but I've seen many projects like this, and they usually collapse by the third week. --- Can Giggle's story be replicated? Honestly, I don't really believe it. --- Solid trading logic? Haha, I've heard that line on many projects. --- Started researching the next day. Your patience is real; I already ran away long ago. --- There are many legitimate wallet addresses, but those truly making money never reveal their cards. --- Keep tracking it. Anyway, I've already exited half of my position and can't afford to gamble anymore. --- PVP projects are indeed chaotic, but be even more cautious with those that seem "not chaotic," as they are often just pretending.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWallflower

· 01-05 04:01

Hmm, it looks like there's something to this. The on-chain data is right there.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuilder

· 01-05 04:00

The next day, there was this on-chain operation logic, which is indeed much more solid than the typical PVP projects.

View OriginalReply0

0xTherapist

· 01-05 03:53

On-chain data doesn't lie; this round of manipulation is indeed quite something.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiLeftOnRead

· 01-05 03:52

On-chain data has its tricks, now I have to keep a close eye on it, or I'll miss the next Giggle again.

View OriginalReply0

MainnetDelayedAgain

· 01-05 03:50

Hey, Giggle only launched in the second week? Happy Sci is only in its second day, and there's still a long way to go before it truly takes off... According to the database, the operations of those wallets are indeed quite interesting. They're much more reliable than the common PVP routines, which is probably why I'm still willing to keep an eye on it.

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_watcher

· 01-05 03:42

On-chain data is definitely worth paying close attention to; such detailed operations are hardly seen in PVP projects.

View OriginalReply0