Trust shouldn't be the price of a swap.

Think about it: if you're moving assets across chains, you're probably relying on bridges, intermediaries, or relayers at some point. The moment trust enters the equation, the whole system becomes fragile.

What if there was another way?

The idea is straightforward but powerful:
→ Your native assets stay exactly where they are
→ Execution follows deterministic rules (no guesswork)
→ Settlement gets locked in, not just promised

No middleman theater. No faith-based finance. Just mechanics.

Swap BTC for ETH? The same principle applies—each step is verifiable, each piece of logic is enforced. You're not betting on someone keeping their word; you're counting on cryptography and code.

That's what decentralized should actually mean.