2026-01-04 17:25:04

A native perpetual contract trading platform is currently under development. The project has secured $300 million in funding and has designed an interesting operational logic: trading volume will continuously flow into a buyback mechanism, creating a rewarding feedback loop for participants.

The core of this model is consistency. In the early stages, it is especially important to focus on balancing expected returns with actual rewards. Traders on such platforms need to remember a few basic principles: control position sizes, use leverage rationally, and view the early operational phase as a learning and validation period rather than a get-rich-quick opportunity. The high returns of perpetual contracts are often accompanied by high risks, especially in the initial stages of an emerging ecosystem, where market liquidity and mechanism stability require time to verify. For participants, cautious exploration is much smarter than blindly chasing high prices.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

25 Likes

Reward
25
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationWatcher

· 01-07 16:05

A $300 million buyback mechanism sounds a bit too ideal... Can the new platform's initial liquidity really hold up? --- At first glance, this logic seems fine, but the key is whether it will eventually turn into a game of pass-the-backet. --- Early participants will always be the most exploited, I choose to stay on the sidelines. --- Leverage is most enjoyable when used, but it's also the easiest time to get liquidated. How many people will suffer this loss with this new platform? --- A buyback mechanism sounds good, but it's hard to say how much actually flows to participants. --- Consistency... I just worry that this consistency might be heading towards the next inconsistency. --- Let's wait a few months until stable operation, then we can talk. Everyone can tell the story of a new project.

View OriginalReply0

rugged_again

· 01-07 05:37

300 million dollars invested, the buyback mechanism sounds good, but how to ensure liquidity on the new platform? --- It's another "early learning stage," we all understand, just a bloody lesson. --- Leverage adds happiness, I just want to know if there are many liquidations. --- Hey, this logic is interesting, trading volume directly triggers buybacks, but it depends on how they maintain the heat later. --- Every time they talk about controlling risk and operating rationally, but when it comes to actually getting in, it's still all in. Don't fool yourself. --- Spending 300 million and still calling it early? Feels like this term is a universal excuse in Web3. --- The feedback loop sounds beautiful, but I'm afraid it's just another Ponzi scheme. --- Stability needs time to be verified? Can my money wait? Haha. --- It sounds nice, but the liquidity pitfalls of new projects are all equally deep.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleStalker

· 01-06 20:06

$300 million investment claims to ensure consistency, I think it's risky. The buyback mechanism sounds good, but how many can actually implement it? Watch and wait before taking action. Leverage is the fastest way to cut leeks; early-stage new platforms are even more dangerous. Early participation = data manipulation. Don't think about getting rich; keep a good mindset to survive until you see the benefits.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-1a2ed0b9

· 01-05 09:14

300 million dollars poured in. The buyback mechanism sounds good, but it depends on actual execution. Early investment in such new platforms really requires honest control of leverage.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-04 17:54

$300 million burned in the buyback feedback loop, sounds good in theory but we'll have to see how it performs in practice.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichTrader

· 01-04 17:50

$300 million buyback mechanism sounds good, but I'm still a bit uneasy about the liquidity on the new platform. --- Another perpetual contract? Take it slow, guys. Don't rush to go all in. These early-stage projects carry really high risks. --- The buyback feedback loop design is quite clever, but the key is whether it can stabilize market liquidity. In my opinion, small positions are the way to test the waters. --- $300 million sounds like a lot, but is it enough for actual operation? I feel like we should wait until it runs stably before considering, or else it might just be another round of rug pulls. --- It looks like there's a trick, but I've learned to be smart about perpetual contracts. Not opening leverage will kill you. Right now, I mainly focus on controlling my positions. --- This model might have a chance for early adopters, but honestly, it's still a gamble on whether it can survive to the next stage. Too uncertain. --- The buyback mechanism can indeed attract people to enter, but my biggest concern is whether there will be frequent liquidations in the early stages. --- Another one? Forget it, I'll just observe for now. No rush. Let others wade through the muddy waters first.

View OriginalReply0

HodlAndChill

· 01-04 17:50

300 million USD investment is just storytelling; the key is whether the liquidity can support it. --- The buyback mechanism sounds good, but who dares to guarantee the risks of a new platform... Still, try a small position to test the waters. --- Another perpetual contract project. Is this really different this time? I remain skeptical. --- Don't expect to get rich overnight early on. That's true, but how many people can really do it? Haha. --- Using too much leverage can lead to liquidation at any moment. The so-called learning phase is actually a harvesting phase. --- Wait and see how the market reacts before entering. No rush.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 01-04 17:49

Investing 300 million USD, the buyback mechanism sounds good, but let's see how long it can last. Perpetual contracts, as always, high returns = high liquidation risk, that's just how new platforms are. Early participants shouldn't expect to get rich overnight, really. Can these platforms sustain liquidity? We still need to observe. Proper position control can really save lives, don't ask me how I know...

View OriginalReply0

CascadingDipBuyer

· 01-04 17:44

300 million USD sounds impressive, but how long the buyback mechanism can last is really uncertain. That's how it was hyped in the early days... --- Another "innovative feedback loop." Will this time be another routine of cutting leeks like yesterday? --- Leverage is a dangerous game; for beginners, it's like giving away money. I see many people's dreams shattered here. --- No rush. Wait for them to tinker for two months before jumping in. Those who enter now are just cannon fodder. --- Lack of liquidity + unstable mechanism, this is a ticking time bomb. Why are people still rushing in? --- It's interesting, but as I always say, no one truly takes the risks of perpetuals seriously. --- Raising 300 million USD indicates many people are involved, but having many people doesn't mean making money.

View OriginalReply0

MevSandwich

· 01-04 17:38

300 million dollars invested, the buyback mechanism sounds good, but can early liquidity support it? --- Another new project, and it’s time to verify the stability of the mechanism. I’ve seen this routine too many times. --- Leverage, when profits look good, everyone wants to go all in; when liquidation happens, everyone regrets. --- Instead of worrying about the buyback cycle, it’s better to ask whether the project’s treasury is healthy. --- Perpetual contract platforms, to put it simply, still depend on whose liquidity pool is deeper; 300 million dollars might not be enough to make a difference. --- Early on, treat it as tuition; if you really see it as an opportunity to earn ten thousand a month, most end up as others’ stop-loss. --- Balancing expectations and returns? Forget it, this industry has never been balanced, only profit or explosion. --- The buyback mechanism looks good, but beware of the mechanism itself being arbitraged. --- Cautious exploration = small-scale trial and error. I agree with this, but most people, after reading, turn around and go all-in.

View OriginalReply0