2026-01-04 17:22:51

The popularity of MEME coins on BSC is currently mainly driven by information asymmetry. The movement of a certain influencer's tweets is the only trigger point, and other channels are basically cut off.

In this situation, the developer's strategy becomes clear:

Step 1: Use API to monitor the latest activities of Twitter accounts in real-time;
Step 2: Use NLP technology to extract usable phrases from tweets as coin names and codes, both in Chinese and English, and create multiple contract addresses simultaneously;
Step 3: Programmatically publish these tokens on DEX platforms, while locking 30% of the liquidity;
Step 4: Contact smart money to quickly push up the external market price;
Step 5: When retail investors only look at external market data, they become the bagholders.

This snowball operation of cutting leeks can scale up to $200,000. The initial capital of $40,000 was invested by two wallets: the dev wallet and the smart money wallet.

MEME-5,31%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ApeEscapeArtist

· 01-06 01:25

Bro, your detailed explanation of this process sounds like you've experienced it firsthand. --- Basically, it's information gap arbitrage. As soon as a big influencer tweets, it becomes fully automated. Truly ruthless. --- Wait, are you saying that all tokens on BSC are played this way now, or only some? --- A $200,000 scale can break even, this business doesn't seem as high a barrier as I imagined. --- Monitoring Twitter plus NLP for token name extraction is industrializing the pump-and-dump scheme. --- So retail investors now entering MEME are 100% getting caught holding the bag, no exceptions. --- Why does this automated pump-and-dump method feel more disgusting than manual trading? At least there's a personal touch. --- Starting with $40,000 and two wallets to grow to $200,000—this multiplier is insane. --- That's why I now only look at on-chain data and avoid hype-driven tweet speculation. --- NLP token name extraction is truly a killer move, directly monetizing the influencer effect.

View OriginalReply0

TokenUnlocker

· 01-05 20:10

Damn, this set of processes is basically industrial-grade slicing, too meticulous API monitoring + NLP automatically generating coin names, how familiar they must be Retail investors are always slaves to external market data, really This is the true face of MEME coins, information asymmetry is exhausted and gone That dev's $40,000 startup capital, the return rate must be 99%, right Monitoring top influencers' tweets to automatically mint coins, how many bots would that take I'm just wondering how so many new coins appear overnight, turns out it's this combo Liquidity locked at 30%, smart money pushes up, retail investors just get caught holding the bag This game is only won by devs and smart money, don't even bother

View OriginalReply0

DeFiCaffeinator

· 01-04 17:50

That's why I'm starting to experience delays when I check Twitter now. I really can't hold it anymore.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalDetective

· 01-04 17:48

This process looks similar to robots competing for orders; indeed, information speed still determines life or death.

View OriginalReply0

FunGibleTom

· 01-04 17:42

Wow, this process is really so dark, I feel like I'm being hunted every day.

View OriginalReply0

just_vibin_onchain

· 01-04 17:41

Damn, this process has already been industrialized, and I can still make 200,000? Why am I still losing money?

View OriginalReply0

WalletDetective

· 01-04 17:40

Damn, this process is way too familiar. I've seen similar ones three times before, each time involving those who suffered huge losses. A big influencer tweets, the bots instantly activate, retail investors are still scrolling on their phones, and the coin has already dumped. These devs are really clever, they even thought of NLP automatic naming, it's completely industrialized leek-cutting. The BSC ecosystem will be regulated sooner or later, right now it's just a meat grinder. I just want to ask, with a scale of $200,000, this is a small workshop. What about the truly big ones? As long as there's an information gap to exploit, there will always be someone doing it.

View OriginalReply0

HappyMinerUncle

· 01-04 17:28

This process is really amazing, treating retail investors like a database. The devs are now working so hard, monitoring Twitter, automating coin issuance—feels like they're working harder than legit projects haha. I just want to ask, with a scale of 200,000 USD, how many actually need to succeed to be considered successful? Using NLP to extract coin names is a really good idea; anyway, retail investors can't tell the difference between real coins and clones. Smart money's $40,000 startup capital feels lower than expected. Honestly, this kind of scam probably isn't popular anymore, everyone knows the tricks now. Poor bagholders, constantly watching external market data—you're really getting the inside scoop. DEX automatic coin issuance, it feels like the threshold has dropped to an all-time low, anyone can do it. Locking liquidity is still pretty ruthless; retail investors can't even get a bottom out of it.

View OriginalReply0