The NFT space just witnessed a telling moment. After securing $50M in funding and rolling out McDonald's collaboration, a major project launched its derivative collection on Upbit. But here's where things get rough: the original holders—those who'd already invested thousands into the base NFT series—turned their backs. Mint rejection rates hit 90%. You read that right. When core community members won't even drop $150 for your new mint, what does that say about project fundamentals? Throw in a native token with zero tangible utility, and you're looking at a blueprint for how community confidence can evaporate. The numbers don't lie—enthusiasm gaps like this expose deeper problems beneath the surface.

MINT0,68%
TOKEN-3,63%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
UnruggableChadvip
· 01-07 08:44
90% abandonment rate, this is the most honest vote.
View OriginalReply0
TokenRationEatervip
· 01-07 04:44
90% abstention rate, this is the true face of big projects.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardianvip
· 01-04 15:57
A 90% abandonment rate, that's outrageous. Even McDonald's can't save this project.
View OriginalReply0
APY追逐者vip
· 01-04 15:56
90% mint rejection rate... This is what is called "confidence bankruptcy," and no amount of funding can save it.
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfervip
· 01-04 15:36
A 90% rejection rate... That's outrageous. You can't even get the money in, and you still want to cut?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)