2026-01-03 02:42:42

The product strength is formidable, and competitors will naturally feel threatened. In the Web3 ecosystem, this logic is even more evident—whichever project dares to implement new features, optimize user experience, and enhance security first, the market will respond quickly. Continuous iteration and upgrades of features exponentially increase the pressure on opponents, ultimately leading to a change in the ecosystem landscape. That is why many project teams are always racing against time—those who innovate faster can gain the upper hand in fierce competition.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

0xSleepDeprived

· 23h ago

There's nothing wrong with what you said, but truly time-winning projects are scarce, and most are still just copying and pasting.

View OriginalReply0

HalfBuddhaMoney

· 01-04 21:28

You're right, but the reality is that most projects can't even copy quickly enough. --- Fast innovation? I think most projects are just copying and pasting. --- The problem is that truly capable projects are few; most are just hype around concepts. --- This logic is idealized; market reactions aren't that fast, and it's just manipulated by whales. --- So, whoever can iterate quickly is the real winner. The big players are all looking for this kind of project. --- Sounds right, but how many in the crypto world can actually execute? Most are just dreamers. --- It's a typical survival of the fittest; those who can't keep up will be eliminated early.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 01-03 03:12

That's true, but the reality is that most projects can't get off the ground at all. They keep hyping up new features every day, but nothing has happened for half a year.

View OriginalReply0

DAOTruant

· 01-03 03:12

That's true, but the reality is that most projects are still copy-pasting, and there are very few who truly dare to innovate.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityLarry

· 01-03 03:05

That's a good point, but the reality is that most projects are just copying and pasting, and there are very few that truly dare to innovate.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-03 03:01

That's true, but there are many projects that move quickly now. How many of them can truly last until the end?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoWageSlave

· 01-03 02:53

That's right, it's all about competition. Now in Web3, anyone who dares to stagnate will be eliminated; falling behind in innovation means getting beaten. --- Really, projects with rapid feature iteration are now reaping the benefits, and their competitors are under immense pressure. --- It's not so much that the market reacts quickly, but that淘汰 (elimination) happens just as fast. Only those who fight for innovation survive. --- That's why I favor projects with solid tech stacks; if security isn't up to standard, they'll be out immediately. --- It sounds like an arms race—whoever stops will die. It's a bit exhausting this way. --- The landscape of Web3 is constantly changing; a new feature can rewrite the entire market—it's crazy. --- But honestly, many projects' innovations are just so-so, not as revolutionary as imagined. There's a lot of following the trend. --- First-mover advantage is really key; not all latecomers can catch up.

View OriginalReply0

FloorSweeper

· 01-03 02:43

That's right, but the reality is that most projects are just copy-pasting, and truly innovative ones are few and far between. --- Rapid iteration sounds great, but I'm afraid that by the end, it will all be bugs and rug pulls. --- First-mover advantage does exist, but the premise is that the product really can compete, not just a new skin for pulling the wool over users' eyes. --- Web3 is indeed competitive, but don't be brainwashed by marketing; actual data is what matters. --- The words sound nice, but the key is whether someone truly has the technical depth and enough capital to support it. --- This logic in the crypto world often boils down to: projects that move fast tend to die quickly. --- What's the use of running fast? In the end, the winners are those who last the longest.

View OriginalReply0