Want to get funding from the ecosystem fund? It’s not a simple task, but it’s not as complicated as you might think either. The key point to understand is: money isn’t given for free; you need to prove that your proposal can bring real value to the entire ecosystem.
This guide is suitable for ecosystem developers, project teams, and individuals seeking funding support. The difficulty level is not low, but if you follow the steps carefully, your chances of success will significantly increase.
First, understand a core principle: the ecosystem treasury indeed holds hundreds of millions of dollars, but the review team values not how grand your dreams are, but whether you can demonstrate that this investment will generate positive externalities—that is, your project must provide tangible benefits to the entire ecosystem. Proposals like "give me money and I’ll help you hype" are basically going to be filtered out.
The first stage of the entire process is called the temperature check. This is the real community interaction phase. You need to initiate discussions on relevant forums, marking them as opinion solicitation. Your post should include several essential parts: a one-sentence summary of your idea; an explanation of why the ecosystem needs this; a detailed description of how to implement it, and an approximate budget.
This step seems simple but is actually the most challenging. Community members will ask all kinds of tricky questions. Some will question your cost estimates as too high; others will doubt the feasibility. The key skill is not to defend defensively but to present a detailed cost breakdown, speaking with data. A clear Excel budget sheet is often more convincing than lengthy explanations.
The goal of this stage is to gather genuine feedback and optimize your plan. If the community engagement is high enough and consensus is strong enough, only then are you qualified to move to the next stage.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayerHopper
· 5h ago
Is it that old familiar routine again, are data breakdown tables really that useful?
I think temperature checks are just community PUA, full of problems but still smiling and welcoming.
So basically, it's all about telling stories; data is just a backdrop, right?
For those projects that actually get funding, isn't there someone behind them?
If Excel sheets were so effective, everyone would have already raised funds, but reality isn't that naive.
The plan optimization sounds good, but community consensus is really about connections.
Off-topic, why doesn't this guide mention approval rates? There should be some real data to back it up.
The group that helps create buzz when funding is provided definitely needs to be screened, but how do strict review standards ensure fairness?
I agree with detailed budget breakdowns, but the key is still presentation—good storytelling can still outshine data easily.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManager
· 5h ago
Data dissection tables are something I've been using for a long time. Add an on-chain analysis screenshot, and it instantly shuts down all doubts. The key is to let reviewers see the concrete numbers of positive externalities—no need for虚假的虚假.
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddict
· 5h ago
Data speaks, nonsense, get lost.
Damn, another step that the community might blow up.
Excel spreadsheets are the real communication tool; long articles are all nonsense.
Want to raise funds? First ask yourself if you truly contribute to the ecosystem.
The temperature check step best reveals who genuinely wants to do the work and who is just here to make money.
Let's hear it—at which stage did your proposal ultimately fail?
If the numbers aren't solid, talking only won't get you anywhere.
This is probably why most proposals don't make it to the next round.
View OriginalReply0
BrokeBeans
· 5h ago
Data speaks for itself; this hits the nail on the head. Too many project teams are just putting on a show with superficial stuff.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhang
· 5h ago
The data speaks for itself, and it's much more effective than bragging.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 5h ago
Speaking of which, data is the real key, and those who make up stories have already been eliminated.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHobo
· 5h ago
I really dislike the kind of "raising funds to hype" tactic; they deserve to be filtered out.
Data speaks for itself, and Excel sheets are indeed more useful than bragging.
Wait, isn't this temperature check just formalism? Community voting is supposed to follow the script.
Those who ask about costs are really taking the ecosystem seriously? I laughed.
Funding seems to depend on details + luck; many good projects die during forum discussion stages.
Want to get funding from the ecosystem fund? It’s not a simple task, but it’s not as complicated as you might think either. The key point to understand is: money isn’t given for free; you need to prove that your proposal can bring real value to the entire ecosystem.
This guide is suitable for ecosystem developers, project teams, and individuals seeking funding support. The difficulty level is not low, but if you follow the steps carefully, your chances of success will significantly increase.
First, understand a core principle: the ecosystem treasury indeed holds hundreds of millions of dollars, but the review team values not how grand your dreams are, but whether you can demonstrate that this investment will generate positive externalities—that is, your project must provide tangible benefits to the entire ecosystem. Proposals like "give me money and I’ll help you hype" are basically going to be filtered out.
The first stage of the entire process is called the temperature check. This is the real community interaction phase. You need to initiate discussions on relevant forums, marking them as opinion solicitation. Your post should include several essential parts: a one-sentence summary of your idea; an explanation of why the ecosystem needs this; a detailed description of how to implement it, and an approximate budget.
This step seems simple but is actually the most challenging. Community members will ask all kinds of tricky questions. Some will question your cost estimates as too high; others will doubt the feasibility. The key skill is not to defend defensively but to present a detailed cost breakdown, speaking with data. A clear Excel budget sheet is often more convincing than lengthy explanations.
The goal of this stage is to gather genuine feedback and optimize your plan. If the community engagement is high enough and consensus is strong enough, only then are you qualified to move to the next stage.