2025-12-31 09:24:35

Now, AI-generated content is becoming increasingly rampant, but you'll find that the truly engaging content still comes from voices that carry genuine human emotion. Whether it's opinions, rants, or analysis, as long as you can feel that there's a real person speaking behind it, it’s much more compelling than cold, robotic AI output.

This phenomenon is especially evident in the Web3 community. Everyone is tired of seeing formatted content and is more interested in authentic, heartfelt, and personally thought-out material. Honestly, I probably am not the only one who thinks this way.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-44a00d6c

· 14h ago

Ah, AI-generated content is really everywhere now, but it still needs a human touch. That said, Web3 is a mixed bag, and it's hard to tell genuine voices from fake ones. Formatting is a real headache, but the key is how to distinguish real from fake. I feel the same, but old pitfalls are never-ending, and new tricks keep coming. We've been talking about the flood of AI content for over a year—when will it actually get better?

View OriginalReply0

ContractBugHunter

· 14h ago

That's so true. The AI formatting output is really annoying. Just a glance and you can tell it's machine-generated. It feels like nowadays, Web3 discussions are full of these template-like responses. In contrast, voices with personality and attitude are more likely to break through the noise. Isn't that why some people still stand out in the era of self-media? Because of that human touch, bro. Hey, it seems like this paragraph itself has been optimized by AI... but it really hits the point.

View OriginalReply0

BoredStaker

· 14h ago

Really, no matter how many AI-generated things there are, they can't compare to a person's genuine rambling. You're right, especially in Web3. I'm tired of those templated analyses flooding the feeds every day. But on the other hand, how do we distinguish who is a real person and who is AI in the future? That's the real question. Formatted content is everywhere, but the voices with real opinions and chaos are more valuable. I just want to hear a living person venting; it's more interesting than reading ten standardized articles.

View OriginalReply0

ZkProofPudding

· 14h ago

Thinking about it, that's really the case. The AI approach feels like an industrial assembly line. People's voices are the most valuable part, especially in Web3, where everyone is looking for genuine voices. All the AI articles that spread false information are useless; it still takes someone with a human touch. Nowadays, honesty and rambling actually resonate more with people. I totally agree. The formatted content really causes aesthetic fatigue. But on the other hand, the voices of truly thoughtful people are still drowned out. Thumbs up, human warmth is indeed more valuable than algorithmic output.

View OriginalReply0

NeverVoteOnDAO

· 14h ago

Exactly right. The AI content flooding the screens now can really be seen through at a glance—those soulless kinds of content. You're right, the Web3 circle really falls for this trick. Compared to fancy templates, a straightforward honest statement is more valuable. Okay, I agree with that, but fewer and fewer people are actually willing to spend time writing meaningful content. What's interesting is that many people actually think this way—no one has spoken it out loud first. Overwhelmingly formatted content is everywhere, but those messy, rambling thoughts are actually more valuable.

View OriginalReply0