CME has once again made a move this week, the second time within a week that margin requirements have been raised, pulling gold, silver, platinum, and gold all into the fold. As a result, silver directly plummeted from 75 to 70, and on the daily chart, it has already experienced two rounds of decline recently. To be honest, this confirms previous judgments—such sudden market crashes are often repeatedly rehearsed by human factors before a real big plunge finally occurs.
The logic behind CME raising margins is actually quite clear. Essentially, it’s similar to central bank rate hikes—by increasing the cost of capital and reducing available leverage, it ultimately achieves a "draining the swamp" effect. Once this move is made, the market responds by falling.
Looking at history makes it clear. The silver crash in 2011, which also occurred during QE, saw a rapid surge, and CME raised margins five times in just nine days, directly bursting the bubble. Silver then plummeted by 30% over the following weeks. Even more extreme was the Hunt Brothers incident in 1980, when the exchange implemented "Silver Rule 7" (only closing positions, no new positions allowed), combined with the Fed’s rate hikes, which forcibly drove down silver prices.
However, this round of silver rally is different from the previous two. Currently, the geopolitical and global landscape are undergoing unprecedented changes in a century. Financial measures can indeed distort supply and demand relationships and suppress prices in the short term, but the long-term trend cannot be dictated by a single exchange. Ultimately, it must return to the actual supply and demand fundamentals. Frankly speaking, this rally itself contains a lot of bubbles inflated by financial institutions, and a burst is indeed possible. But if we look at normal supply and demand, stable prices should be in the 45-55 range.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PaperHandsCriminal
· 7h ago
Damn, here we go again? CME for the second time this week, this is just ridiculous.
I just want to ask, how long can this tactic of pulling the rug out be used?
Is 45-55 really the true price? Then I guess I’m completely wiped out now...
That wave in 2011 my grandfather mentioned, now it’s happening again, are they treating us as if we have a bad memory?
How many more market crashes need to happen before they’re considered enough, really.
It seems like financial institutions just love to blow bubbles, pop them, then blow them again, and we just get caught in the middle...
With such obvious patterns in history, how can people still fall into the trap? I really don’t get it.
If this situation collapses, how much would we be losing? I don’t even dare to think about it.
Geopolitical shifts can’t change the essence of exchanges having crooked intentions, right?
Silver dropped from 75 to 70 overnight, is this what you call a "normal adjustment"?
I bet five bucks that before the 45-55 range appears, there will be a few more waves.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 7h ago
Using this trick again? CME's tactics are just this much, they only dare to really hit after a few rehearsals, it's an old trick
History is repeating itself, that five-hit combo from 2011 is happening again, why are people still surprised
But this time is different, under geopolitical chaos, financial measures can't suppress the long-term logic, it ultimately comes down to supply and demand
45-55 is the normal price? Then this recent surge definitely has a lot of hype
CME's move to cut off the bottom is quite clever, but it can't change the overall pattern
View OriginalReply0
GasGoblin
· 7h ago
The move of "draining the pond to catch the fish" is indeed ruthless. CME is clearly telling you: want to play with leverage? Add more money.
History will repeat itself, but this time the geopolitical situation is different. Financial measures can't suppress the long-term trend.
Silver at 45-55 is the real price; right now, it's all water.
CME's recent operation is a textbook example of harvesting; the last time in 2011, they hadn't learned enough.
It's nonsense—short-term dumping a few times and then truly dumping, very套路.
In the long run, it still depends on actual supply. Financial giants can't play this game forever.
Exactly, only when the bubble bursts does the real beginning start.
That's why we must be cautious of leverage; one margin increase can wipe out your entire capital.
Jumping from 75 to 70 just like that, and it will be even more fierce later.
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walking
· 7h ago
The move of draining the pond to catch the fish is indeed ruthless, but in the long run, it still depends on supply and demand.
---
I remember the wave in 2011, with 5 times in 9 days, which was really outrageous. Now CME wants to repeat that?
---
This round is different from before. The geopolitical situation is there, and financial measures can't suppress the long-term trend.
---
Silver dropped directly from 75 to 70, indicating there is still room to fall. It needs to drop to 45-55 to be considered over.
---
Repeatedly practicing a few times before truly smashing the market. This is a clever trick by exchanges; retail investors are just the ones being cut.
---
CME increasing margin is like the central bank raising interest rates. The logic is clear, but ultimately, the market still returns to the reality of supply and demand.
---
When bubbles are blown too much, they will burst eventually. The key is when it will burst and how far it will go.
---
Looking at history, the 1980 Hunt brothers' wave was even more brutal, directly banning new positions. Would they dare to do this again now?
---
Long-term trend trading cannot be decided by exchanges; they can only distort supply and demand in the short term. Let's just wait and see what happens next.
CME has once again made a move this week, the second time within a week that margin requirements have been raised, pulling gold, silver, platinum, and gold all into the fold. As a result, silver directly plummeted from 75 to 70, and on the daily chart, it has already experienced two rounds of decline recently. To be honest, this confirms previous judgments—such sudden market crashes are often repeatedly rehearsed by human factors before a real big plunge finally occurs.
The logic behind CME raising margins is actually quite clear. Essentially, it’s similar to central bank rate hikes—by increasing the cost of capital and reducing available leverage, it ultimately achieves a "draining the swamp" effect. Once this move is made, the market responds by falling.
Looking at history makes it clear. The silver crash in 2011, which also occurred during QE, saw a rapid surge, and CME raised margins five times in just nine days, directly bursting the bubble. Silver then plummeted by 30% over the following weeks. Even more extreme was the Hunt Brothers incident in 1980, when the exchange implemented "Silver Rule 7" (only closing positions, no new positions allowed), combined with the Fed’s rate hikes, which forcibly drove down silver prices.
However, this round of silver rally is different from the previous two. Currently, the geopolitical and global landscape are undergoing unprecedented changes in a century. Financial measures can indeed distort supply and demand relationships and suppress prices in the short term, but the long-term trend cannot be dictated by a single exchange. Ultimately, it must return to the actual supply and demand fundamentals. Frankly speaking, this rally itself contains a lot of bubbles inflated by financial institutions, and a burst is indeed possible. But if we look at normal supply and demand, stable prices should be in the 45-55 range.