Recently, former SEC Chairman Paul Atkins made a statement that caused a stir in the industry—he explicitly called Ethereum a "key component," which is not a casual remark but an official recognition from the traditional financial regulatory perspective.
Why did this statement attract attention? Looking at it from several angles makes it clear.
From a regulatory standpoint, the attitude of core decision-makers often indicates the direction of policy. Clear regulatory signals mean that the compliance framework for cryptocurrencies is gradually taking shape. Looking at the ecosystem itself—Ethereum hosts over 50% of the total DeFi locked value, and many innovative projects are rooted and growing on this chain. This is a genuine market choice, not hype. For traditional institutions and large funds wanting to enter the crypto space, Ethereum is essentially an unavoidable gateway, with market liquidity and security standing firm.
From a fundamental perspective, ETH has entered a deflationary trajectory after the merge, with on-chain data continuously solidifying the foundation. Official recognition combined with robust technical fundamentals and active ecosystem truly marks a key point for re-evaluating Ethereum’s value.
So the question is—can this endorsement trigger subsequent market movements? Is it time to heavily accumulate or continue observing? Feel free to share your judgment and thoughts in the comments.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RetiredMiner
· 11h ago
Atkins' words are like a reassuring pill, but if you really want to invest, you still need to see how BTC's movements turn out first.
View OriginalReply0
0xLostKey
· 11h ago
Atkins' words sound good, but can regulatory approval really boost the market? History shows it might not be the case.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 11h ago
ETH's official recognition this time is indeed a bit different, but heavy investment? I'll wait and see the subsequent actions first.
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollector
· 11h ago
Regulatory approval + deflationary + DeFi dominance, ETH this wave is quite something
View OriginalReply0
WinterWarmthCat
· 11h ago
Atkins' words indeed gave the market a shot in the arm. ETH's fundamentals are already solid, and with big players endorsing it, it's even more stable.
Should we hold a heavy position or keep waiting? Honestly, it still depends on BTC's next move. When BTC surges, ETH tends to follow.
The 50% lock-up volume in DeFi is real and tangible.
#数字资产动态追踪 $BTC $XRP $ETH
Recently, former SEC Chairman Paul Atkins made a statement that caused a stir in the industry—he explicitly called Ethereum a "key component," which is not a casual remark but an official recognition from the traditional financial regulatory perspective.
Why did this statement attract attention? Looking at it from several angles makes it clear.
From a regulatory standpoint, the attitude of core decision-makers often indicates the direction of policy. Clear regulatory signals mean that the compliance framework for cryptocurrencies is gradually taking shape. Looking at the ecosystem itself—Ethereum hosts over 50% of the total DeFi locked value, and many innovative projects are rooted and growing on this chain. This is a genuine market choice, not hype. For traditional institutions and large funds wanting to enter the crypto space, Ethereum is essentially an unavoidable gateway, with market liquidity and security standing firm.
From a fundamental perspective, ETH has entered a deflationary trajectory after the merge, with on-chain data continuously solidifying the foundation. Official recognition combined with robust technical fundamentals and active ecosystem truly marks a key point for re-evaluating Ethereum’s value.
So the question is—can this endorsement trigger subsequent market movements? Is it time to heavily accumulate or continue observing? Feel free to share your judgment and thoughts in the comments.