The race for AI supremacy between the US and China has been framed as a neck-and-neck competition, with both nations pouring resources into maintaining technological parity. However, 2026 could mark a critical inflection point where the dynamics shift fundamentally. Rather than a single race with shared rules, they may increasingly operate under divergent strategic frameworks—divergent in technology stacks, governance models, and application priorities. The gap isn't necessarily widening in raw capability; it's that each is optimizing for fundamentally different outcomes, making direct comparison increasingly meaningless.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroHerovip
· 9h ago
Now it's not about which country is faster, but each playing their own game.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420vip
· 10h ago
This is not a track problem; these are two different paths. Comparing who is faster is meaningless.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 10h ago
It's impossible to compare different tracks; this is the key point.
View OriginalReply0
SleepTradervip
· 10h ago
Haha, this is the core... It's not about who runs faster, but who runs toward different destinations.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)