FOMC Minutes Show Growing Disagreement


The main issue remains whether to prioritize maintaining stability or supporting growth
To support employment, rate cuts are needed, but this could lead to rising inflation
To curb inflation, no rate cuts or even rate hikes are necessary, which could result in significant unemployment

Based on past experience, the probability of the Federal Reserve prioritizing inflation control over employment is higher, with the 1980s even seeing rate hikes up to 24%. Such a scenario is unimaginable and hard to comprehend today.

A rate hike to 24% is quite extreme, but it also indirectly indicates the Fed's inclination. Therefore, in the absence of a clear overwhelming reason to cut rates, the default is likely to keep rates unchanged.
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)