The most frequently asked question recently is: What do you think about the current market? Prices are rising so quickly, is it really not a bubble?
Having worked in risk management for many years, I have some insights I want to share—rather than obsessing over daily price fluctuations, it’s better to understand the logic behind this rally. Only by grasping the underlying drivers can we judge the market’s resilience.
From a broader perspective, I’ve noticed three key variables changing:
**Openings on the Capital Supply Side**
The approval of spot ETFs is more significant than many imagine. You see, previously, large institutional funds like pension funds and insurance companies had almost no legal channels to allocate to Bitcoin. Now, with official channels available, what does that mean? It signifies a brand-new influx of capital being unlocked. This isn’t small-scale; it’s a transition from the "underground" to the "mainstream," fundamentally changing the liquidity base.
**Evolution of Policy Narratives**
Recently, there has been discussion in some countries about including Bitcoin in strategic reserves. Although still in the conceptual stage, the market is already digesting this signal. Once such policies are implemented, the supply-demand relationship will undergo structural changes. Think about it—if demand at the national level intervenes, the scale of that demand is on a completely different level. This shifts the fundamental perception of Bitcoin—from a speculative asset to a store of value.
**Recalibration of Valuation Frameworks**
The market often compares Bitcoin to gold. Gold’s total market cap is about $18 trillion, while Bitcoin is just over one-tenth of that. This comparison itself is quite interesting—if Bitcoin can gradually take on the role of a "store of value," then in the long term, discussions about valuation space are no longer fanciful. It doesn’t necessarily mean reaching gold’s scale, but this reference provides us with a perspective for thinking.
**So, what about the $100,000 price level?**
Honestly, round-number levels often reflect psychological expectations. More importantly, it’s crucial to understand what logic supports the assets you hold.
For ordinary investors like us, there’s a useful saying: If you don’t understand it, don’t touch it; if you do, only invest within your risk tolerance. Don’t blindly follow FOMO. Additionally, maintaining an understanding and learning about new assets within your overall asset allocation framework is itself a form of long-term investment literacy.
These are some of my thoughts, and I hope they can offer you a different perspective.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
IntrovertMetaverse
· 9h ago
The current issue is not whether there is a bubble, but whether you understand what you are buying.
The opening of ETFs indeed changes the game rules; institutional capital entering the market is a whole different story.
I quite agree with the logic of comparing BTC to gold, although it's still a long way off, there is definitely room for imagination.
The main thing is to avoid FOMO; if your mindset collapses, it's very hard to make money.
You shouldn't touch things you don't understand; this advice is as valuable as gold.
The psychological impact of integer thresholds is significant, but the underlying logic is the real thing.
If a national-level demand truly arrives, the gameplay will be completely different.
Instead of obsessing over K-line charts, it's better to understand the underlying logic; what they say makes sense.
View OriginalReply0
CompoundPersonality
· 9h ago
A bit agree, but to be honest, does opening an ETF mean there's no more bubble? I always feel that institutional funds entering might actually push prices higher.
If you don't understand, don't touch this. I need to remember it. Too many people keep shouting that 100,000 is just around the corner, which is more reliable.
The logic of comparing gold can indeed be explained thoroughly, but historically, how many assets have been benchmarked, and then what?
The transformation of reserve assets... easy to say, but will the country really allocate?
FOMO is a keyword that hits me. Why do some people still follow the trend even though they know better?
It's really just a matter of time; as long as the underlying logic is there, there's nothing to fear.
The spot ETF has indeed changed the entire game rules. Agreed.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 9h ago
Talking about the underlying logic again. I thought the same last time, and then when the liquidation price was hit, I went into a daze. If only I had known earlier, it would have been worth a thousand gold.
View OriginalReply0
RooftopVIP
· 10h ago
To put it simply, the ETF thing has indeed changed the game rules; institutional entry is no small matter.
The most frequently asked question recently is: What do you think about the current market? Prices are rising so quickly, is it really not a bubble?
Having worked in risk management for many years, I have some insights I want to share—rather than obsessing over daily price fluctuations, it’s better to understand the logic behind this rally. Only by grasping the underlying drivers can we judge the market’s resilience.
From a broader perspective, I’ve noticed three key variables changing:
**Openings on the Capital Supply Side**
The approval of spot ETFs is more significant than many imagine. You see, previously, large institutional funds like pension funds and insurance companies had almost no legal channels to allocate to Bitcoin. Now, with official channels available, what does that mean? It signifies a brand-new influx of capital being unlocked. This isn’t small-scale; it’s a transition from the "underground" to the "mainstream," fundamentally changing the liquidity base.
**Evolution of Policy Narratives**
Recently, there has been discussion in some countries about including Bitcoin in strategic reserves. Although still in the conceptual stage, the market is already digesting this signal. Once such policies are implemented, the supply-demand relationship will undergo structural changes. Think about it—if demand at the national level intervenes, the scale of that demand is on a completely different level. This shifts the fundamental perception of Bitcoin—from a speculative asset to a store of value.
**Recalibration of Valuation Frameworks**
The market often compares Bitcoin to gold. Gold’s total market cap is about $18 trillion, while Bitcoin is just over one-tenth of that. This comparison itself is quite interesting—if Bitcoin can gradually take on the role of a "store of value," then in the long term, discussions about valuation space are no longer fanciful. It doesn’t necessarily mean reaching gold’s scale, but this reference provides us with a perspective for thinking.
**So, what about the $100,000 price level?**
Honestly, round-number levels often reflect psychological expectations. More importantly, it’s crucial to understand what logic supports the assets you hold.
For ordinary investors like us, there’s a useful saying: If you don’t understand it, don’t touch it; if you do, only invest within your risk tolerance. Don’t blindly follow FOMO. Additionally, maintaining an understanding and learning about new assets within your overall asset allocation framework is itself a form of long-term investment literacy.
These are some of my thoughts, and I hope they can offer you a different perspective.