What truly supports consensus? It's not just slogans and emotional drives; the key lies in mechanism design that fosters a community of shared interests among participants.

Taking the Miniverse project as an example, its logic is quite interesting. Buying U mining machines pushes prices higher, encouraging further repurchases, and the same applies to promotion—throughout the process, every participant's actions are directed toward the same goal. A deeper aspect of the design is the exit mechanism: when someone withdraws LP, the project triggers a destruction logic (up to 100% of tokens can be destroyed), which effectively reduces the circulating supply and inversely supports the value of assets held by remaining holders.

Buying pushes prices up, selling triggers destruction—the mechanism is self-consistent, making it difficult for participants to escape this cycle. From a game theory perspective, this design is indeed quite restrained.