Recently, this round of ETF applications indeed shows promise. AAVE and UNI, as leading projects in the DeFi space, have their values closely tied to on-chain lending and trading activity, while ZEC focuses on privacy use cases to meet the privacy needs of specific users. Interestingly, the products also include tokens from emerging public chains like NEAR and SUI, which clearly indicates a bet on the development potential of next-generation blockchain infrastructure.



From a allocation logic perspective, 60% of the holdings are direct token holdings, while 40% are held indirectly through compliant ETP products. This design is quite clever—it maintains the purity of actual asset exposure while enhancing liquidity and compliance through regulated products, and also leaves room for risk hedging or yield enhancement via derivatives.

From a regulatory progress standpoint, this institution has been adopting a gradual approach. Starting from early index funds, moving to applications for single-asset ETFs, then facing setbacks with multi-asset schemes, and now launching single-asset strategy ETFs. Each step tests the SEC’s bottom line, gradually expanding the scope of crypto assets that can be included.

If such products are truly approved smoothly, it would be quite significant. Institutional investors will be able to directly allocate to DeFi ecosystem tokens through formal channels, not limited to Bitcoin and Ethereum. This could lead to more diversified capital flows into crypto assets and is a key step in building a robust crypto financial system.
AAVE-3,38%
UNI-4,04%
ZEC-4,06%
SUI-2,25%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseMigrantvip
· 9h ago
Haha, finally someone dares to push forward in the DeFi coin sector. The SEC hurdle is indeed tough.
View OriginalReply0
FunGibleTomvip
· 9h ago
Wow, did NEAR and SUI really get on board this time? This is the kind of setup idea I want to see.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyervip
· 9h ago
The 60/40 allocation strategy is indeed clever; it can maintain asset purity while remaining flexible... But honestly, it's still about testing the SEC's temper.
View OriginalReply0
DevChivevip
· 9h ago
The 60/40 allocation is really awesome; just wondering if the SEC will buy it... NEAR and SUI this time are a bit of a gamble on the future.
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamervip
· 9h ago
The 60:40 allocation ratio really has some merit. Wanting to maintain asset exposure while staying compliant, SEC's moves are becoming increasingly sophisticated.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMaskedRidervip
· 10h ago
The 60 to 40 ratio is truly genius, allowing for actual exposure while staying within compliant channels. This time, the SEC probably can't stop it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)