The challenge to go from 10u target to 10000u has already failed once, and now it's the second attempt. Yesterday's Ethereum holdings reached a breakeven point, mainly because I observed a clear consolidation pattern forming. The moment of indecision is indeed uncomfortable.
But after weighing the options, I still plan to go for this breakout. The logic is simple—if I can break through the upper boundary of the consolidation, there is a chance to continue the upward trend; if it falls below the lower boundary, I am also prepared to reverse my position. This approach of attacking when possible and defending when necessary feels more secure than passive waiting.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
UnluckyLemur
· 2025-12-31 07:51
Ha, it's the same old story "attack when possible, defend when necessary." It feels like every time I say this, I end up getting played anyway.
View OriginalReply0
BearEatsAll
· 2025-12-31 07:51
Haha, the second battle. Will I turn things around this time? Let's see.
View OriginalReply0
NftDeepBreather
· 2025-12-31 07:47
Betting 10u to win 10,000u, it sounds like a gambler's dream... But I understand the decision to go all-in; consolidation is indeed the most uncomfortable phase.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 2025-12-31 07:27
Bro, you went all out for the second battle, how much adrenaline did you consume?
The challenge to go from 10u target to 10000u has already failed once, and now it's the second attempt. Yesterday's Ethereum holdings reached a breakeven point, mainly because I observed a clear consolidation pattern forming. The moment of indecision is indeed uncomfortable.
But after weighing the options, I still plan to go for this breakout. The logic is simple—if I can break through the upper boundary of the consolidation, there is a chance to continue the upward trend; if it falls below the lower boundary, I am also prepared to reverse my position. This approach of attacking when possible and defending when necessary feels more secure than passive waiting.
What does everyone think of this idea?