Are you the same way? Scrolling through the feed every day, can't stop your fingers, and you can judge whether a project is worth looking at in three seconds. No story point? Skip. No clear tags? Skip. Can't see immediate emotional stimulation? Keep scrolling.

As a result, projects like Oracle, which provide underlying data services, just disappear at our fingertips.

Don’t argue. I was like this at first too. It’s not that I really dislike it, I just think "there's no need to waste time now." The market is bombarding us daily with Meme coins, attracting attention with large airdrops, and stimulating nerves with stories of rapid gains. Compared to that, projects focused on infrastructure seem too dull, with no chance to fight back in the attention race.

The problem is, we may have made a serious mistake: confusing "not understanding" with "having no value."

Why do we want to give up at the first encounter? The reason is actually very simple.

It doesn’t fit our usual "quick judgment system": no clear hot tags. It’s not Layer 2 scaling, not AI storytelling, nor on-chain real assets. So what is it? It’s the underlying pipeline that provides trustworthy data support for all these hot projects. This story is too basic, not stimulating at all. It triggers fatigue, not anticipation. Over the past few years, terms like "infrastructure" and "long-term development" have been overused. When you see a project’s white paper and technical roadmap, many people automatically react: "Another pie-in-the-sky project?" The market has long been scarred by trust issues with infrastructure, and projects like Oracle just happen to hit that pain point. It requires you to actively understand, not passively receive. The project team talks about node consensus, data verification, economic security mechanisms—things that require you to invest cognitive effort to digest. In an age of information explosion, no one wants to bother with that.