How intense has the talent war in Silicon Valley become? Just look at the numbers from OpenAI.
This AI giant's average stock compensation per person is about $1.5 million. What does that mean? During the same period before Google's IPO, the stock compensation to revenue ratio was only about 15%, and Facebook was only 6%. And what about OpenAI? By 2025, total compensation will have eaten up 46% of revenue. The gap is obvious at a glance.
Even more aggressive, OpenAI recently removed the restriction that stock options can only be vested after six months of employment. This is not a small move—financial forecasts show that by the night before 2030, the company's annual stock compensation expenditure will grow at a rate of $3 billion. What does this mean? It means they are using real money to lock in the world's top technical talent.
From a broader perspective, this "high revenue, high subsidy" approach is essentially using capital to buy time and talent. For the entire AI track, this sends a signal: the premium effect for top talent will become increasingly apparent. Around 2026, the development costs in Web3 and AI-related fields may be further driven up. The talent war in Silicon Valley is reshaping the cost structure of the entire ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasOptimizer
· 8h ago
46% of the revenue is eaten up, this is true all-in, OpenAI really treats talent as the ultimate scarce resource
View OriginalReply0
StopLossMaster
· 8h ago
46% of the revenue is eaten up... This is locking all the geniuses out, really ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrince
· 8h ago
Damn, 46% of the salary accounts for revenue... OpenAI is planning to buy out all the geniuses. If this continues, how are other companies supposed to compete...
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapist
· 8h ago
46% of revenue goes to salaries and compensation. Isn't that basically burning money? OpenAI really dares to bet big.
View OriginalReply0
MindsetExpander
· 8h ago
1.5 million USD per person in stock compensation... This directly blows up the cost structure. How can small teams survive?
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretter
· 8h ago
46%? This isn't burning money, it's directly poaching people. No wonder Web3 developers are being recruited away.
How intense has the talent war in Silicon Valley become? Just look at the numbers from OpenAI.
This AI giant's average stock compensation per person is about $1.5 million. What does that mean? During the same period before Google's IPO, the stock compensation to revenue ratio was only about 15%, and Facebook was only 6%. And what about OpenAI? By 2025, total compensation will have eaten up 46% of revenue. The gap is obvious at a glance.
Even more aggressive, OpenAI recently removed the restriction that stock options can only be vested after six months of employment. This is not a small move—financial forecasts show that by the night before 2030, the company's annual stock compensation expenditure will grow at a rate of $3 billion. What does this mean? It means they are using real money to lock in the world's top technical talent.
From a broader perspective, this "high revenue, high subsidy" approach is essentially using capital to buy time and talent. For the entire AI track, this sends a signal: the premium effect for top talent will become increasingly apparent. Around 2026, the development costs in Web3 and AI-related fields may be further driven up. The talent war in Silicon Valley is reshaping the cost structure of the entire ecosystem.