After the Debot security vulnerability incident, the project's emergency response efficiency is indeed commendable—affected users have been receiving compensation one after another, and it is understood that 3.15 BNB has already been credited. Speaking of trading bots, tools like GMGN and Pink Pig each have their own features, but after using them, I still feel that some products have more intuitive operation logic. Although this time Debot encountered a pitfall, based on the attitude and speed of post-incident handling, the team values user feedback quite well. Whether future product iterations can further refine protection mechanisms and usability is what users truly care about.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CoconutWaterBoy
· 14h ago
As long as the compensation is received, the key is to see how well the subsequent protection is implemented; otherwise, it would be pointless again.
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPC
· 14h ago
The compensation arrived quite quickly, but I still care more about whether they will truly fix the vulnerability in the future. Otherwise, it would be awkward if it happens again.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_resilient
· 14h ago
The compensation has arrived pretty well, but the real test is whether there will be a crash again next time.
After the Debot security vulnerability incident, the project's emergency response efficiency is indeed commendable—affected users have been receiving compensation one after another, and it is understood that 3.15 BNB has already been credited. Speaking of trading bots, tools like GMGN and Pink Pig each have their own features, but after using them, I still feel that some products have more intuitive operation logic. Although this time Debot encountered a pitfall, based on the attitude and speed of post-incident handling, the team values user feedback quite well. Whether future product iterations can further refine protection mechanisms and usability is what users truly care about.