2025-12-31 06:26:01

Some projects just rush in without a clear direction and face the consequences. When it comes to creator economics in crypto, most people seem indifferent about the fee structures being implemented. The market doesn't seem to care much about how these incentive mechanisms are designed, which raises questions about whether project teams are actually thinking this through.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 10h ago

Really, a bunch of projects just mess around without thinking it through before launching.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaLeaker

· 10h ago

Basically, it's a group of people working behind closed doors, designing even the transaction fees poorly and still trying to attract creators? Wake up, brothers.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 10h ago

To put it simply, most projects are just impulsive decisions without clear plans on how to operate the creator economy. No one cares about the fee structure or similar details—that's the real problem.

View OriginalReply0

gas_guzzler

· 10h ago

Really, a bunch of projects went live without really thinking it through, and no one truly looked at the fee structure... If you ask me, it's just the team being lazy.

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 10h ago

There's nothing wrong with what you said. Many projects are just messing around without thinking clearly about how to develop the creator economy. The fee setup and all that stuff really doesn't matter to everyone; as long as they can't take the money, it's fine haha

View OriginalReply0